ArticleBMC microbiology2024
Correlation of gut microbial diversity to sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The relationship between diabetic retinopathy and intestinal microbiota: a systematic review and meta analysis.International ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- The gut-eye axis: microbiota and their role in diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Intermittent fasting in diabetic retinopathy: microbiome modulation, mechanisms, and clinical insights.Cardiovascular endocrinology & metabolism · 2026Review
- Dietary patterns and exploratory gut microbiota profiles associated with diabetic retinopathy and cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes.Nutrition & metabolism · 2026Article
- The Gut-Eye Axis and Microbiome in Ophthalmic Diseases: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Regulatory mechanisms of Traditional Chinese Medicine on gut microbiota in diabetic microvascular complications.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Gut microbiome changes in people with diabetic retinopathy in India. DRMS-India report # 1: operational protocol and trends from first 100 participants.Gut pathogens · 2026Article
- Linking the microbiome to the complement system in geographic atrophy.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026Article
- Crosstalk between gut microbiota and RNA N6-methyladenosine modification in diabetic retinopathy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Oral-associated bacteria in the gut microbiome of individuals with type 2 diabetes: a secondary analysis of metagenomic data.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the association of gut microbiome diversity and sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) amongst patients with pre-existing diabetes.
methodsA cross-sectional study was performed, wherein 54 participants selected in total were placed into cases cohort if diagnosed with STDR and those without STDR but had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus of at least 10-year duration were taken as controls. Statistical analysis comparing the gut microbial alpha diversity between cases and control groups as well as patients differentiated based on previously hypothesized Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes(B/F) ratio with an optimal cut-off 1.05 to identify patients with STDR were performed.
resultsComparing gut microbial alpha diversity did not show any difference between cases and control groups. However, statistically significant difference was noted amongst patients with B/F ratio ≥1.05 when compared to B/F ratio < 1.05; ACE index [Cut-off < 1.05:773.83 ± 362.73; Cut-off > 1.05:728.03 ± 227.37; p-0.016]; Chao1index [Cut-off < 1.05:773.63 ± 361.88; Cut-off > 1.05:728.13 ± 227.58; p-0.016]; Simpson index [Cut-off < 1.05:0.998 ± 0.001; Cut-off > 1.05:0.997 ± 0.001; p-0.006]; Shannon index [Cut-off < 1.05:6.37 ± 0.49; Cut-off > 1.05:6.10 ± 0.43; p-0.003]. Sub-group analysis showed that cases with B/F ratio ≥ 1.05, divided into proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and clinically significant macular edema (CSME), showed decreased diversity compared to controls (B/F ratio < 1.05). For PDR, all four diversity indices significantly decreased (p < 0.05). However, for CSME, only Shannon and Simpson indices showed significant decrease in diversity (p < 0.05).
conclusionsBased on clinical diagnosis, decreasing gut microbial diversity was observed among patients with STDR, although not statistically significant. When utilizing B/F ratio, the decreasing gut microbial diversity in STDR patients seems to be associated due to species richness and evenness in PDR when compared to decreasing species richness in CSME.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.