ArticleBMC emergency medicine2024
Factors affecting neurological outcomes of patients with sudden cardiac arrest in the emergency department.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about patients with sudden cardiac arrest in the emergency department (ED). This study aimed to identify factors affecting the prognosis of patients with cardiac arrest in the ED.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed patients with sudden cardiac arrest admitted to the ED of a general hospital between January 2016 and July 2020. A total of 153 patients with sudden cardiac arrest were identified, and 149 patients for whom all data could be confirmed were included in the statistical analysis of this study. A good neurological outcome was defined as a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale score of 1 or 2, assessed 6 months after discharge.
resultsIn the univariate analysis, the characteristics of patients included in the good neurological outcomes group were younger (t = 3.553, p < .001), had shorter low flow time (t = 3.31, p = .019), and had more shockable initial rhythms (χ
conclusionsYoung age, short low-flow-time, and initial shockable rhythm are predictors of good neurological outcomes in patients with acute cardiac arrest in the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.