ArticleScientific reports2024
Study on long short-term memory based on vector direction of flood process for flood forecasting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate flood forecasting is crucial for flood prevention and mitigation, safeguarding the lives and properties of residents, as well as the rational use of water resources. The study proposes a model of long and short-term memory (LSTM) combined with the vector direction (VD) of the flood process. The Jingle and Lushi basins were selected as the research objects, and the model was trained and validated using 50 and 49 measured flood rainfall-runoff data in a 7:3 division ratio, respectively. The results indicate that the VD-LSTM model has more advantages than the LSTM model, with increased NSE, and reduced RMSE and bias to varying degrees. The flow simulation results of VD-LSTM better match the observed flow hydrographs, improving the underestimation of peak flows and the lag issue of the model. Under the same task and dataset, with the same hyperparameter settings, VD-LSTM can more quickly reduce the loss function value and achieve a better fit compared to LSTM. The proposed VD-LSTM model couples the vectorization process of flood runoff with the LSTM neural network, which contributes to the model better exploring the change characteristics of rising and receding water in flood runoff processes, reducing the training gradient error of input-output data for the LSTM model, and more effectively simulating flood process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.