ArticleScientific reports2024
An identification method of LBL underwater positioning systematic error with optimal selection criterion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unlike the space targets such as satellites whose observation distance is about the order of 100 km, the measurement distance of long baseline (LBL) underwater positioning system is much shorter. If the noncoincidence between the multiple beacons and the target center is not considered, this systematic error will cause a little larger positioning error. Therefore, aiming at the situation that multiple beacons are installed outside the target and the distance between the beacons and the target center is significant, a multi-beacon positioning model of the LBL underwater system is constructed in this paper. Furthermore, for the sound speed systematic error and the time of arrival (TOA) systematic error in the multi-beacon LBL system positioning measurement data, three identification models of systematic error are constructed. According to the positioning process of the LBL underwater system, the expression of the optimal test statistic D is derived based on the TOA residual. Finally, the optimal selection criterion is given, and the underwater target position and systematic error can be accurately estimated. Both of the numerical simulation and the underwater positioning test show that the appropriate identification model of systematic error in the measurement data can be selected according to the optimal selection criterion, and the underwater target positioning accuracy of the LBL system can be improved.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.