ArticleScientific reports2024
Comprehensive comparison between vision transformers and convolutional neural networks for face recognition tasks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Efficient Biological Codon Recognition Reservoir Computing System Based on Low-Energy Epitaxial HfAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A new framework for facial age estimation in humans and AIs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- PMI estimation with cross-species transfer learning and visual information generated by pathomics foundation model.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Hybrid CNN with angular margin supervision for robust face identification and verification.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Impact of quantization on various CNN architectures for bone fracture detection.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Article
- Leveraging Vision Transformers for High-Precision Classification of Cancer Cell Cultures: A Comparative Study on MDA-MB-231 and PC3 Datasets.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Computational origins of shape perception.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Dissociating physiological ripples and epileptiform discharges with vision transformers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A Comparison Study of Person Identification Using IR Array Sensors and LiDAR.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Applications, image analysis, and interpretation of computer vision in medical imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive comparison between Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks for face recognition related tasks, including extensive experiments on the tasks of face identification and verification. Our study focuses on six state-of-the-art models: EfficientNet, Inception, MobileNet, ResNet, VGG, and Vision Transformers. Our evaluation of these models is based on five diverse datasets: Labeled Faces in the Wild, Real World Occluded Faces, Surveillance Cameras Face, UPM-GTI-Face, and VGG Face 2. These datasets present unique challenges regarding people diversity, distance from the camera, and face occlusions such as those produced by masks and glasses. Our contribution to the field includes a deep analysis of the experimental results, including a thorough examination of the training and evaluation process, as well as the software and hardware configurations used. Our results show that Vision Transformers outperform Convolutional Neural Networks in terms of accuracy and robustness against distance and occlusions for face recognition related tasks, while also presenting a smaller memory footprint and an impressive inference speed, rivaling even the fastest Convolutional Neural Networks. In conclusion, our study provides valuable insights into the performance of Vision Transformers for face recognition related tasks and highlights the potential of these models as a more efficient solution than Convolutional Neural Networks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.