ArticleScientific reports2024
Clinical efficacy of a head-mounted device for central vision loss.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence and patient reported outcomes in ophthalmology.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Pooled it
- The Usefulness of a Wearable Electronic Vision Enhancement System for People With Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized Crossover Trial.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Trial
- Evaluation of an Augmented-Reality Head-Mounted Display Among Patients With Glaucomatous Tunnel Vision.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Central vision loss (CVL) is a major form of low vision that remains inadequately managed worldwide. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of a novel head-mounted device (HMD), Onyx, designed to enhance visual function and vision-related quality of life for CVL patients. It employs a projection system that enables patients to leverage their residual peripheral vision for environmental awareness. It also integrates artificial intelligence to augment the automatic recognition of text, faces, and objects. In this single-center, prospective cohort study, 41 binocularly low vision patients with CVL were instructed to use Onyx for 4 to 6 h daily over a one-month period. Various metrics were assessed, including near and distance visual acuity (VA), recognition abilities for faces and objects, and the low vision quality-of-life (LVQOL) questionnaire scores, at the start and end of the study. The results showed significant improvements in near VA for 60.98% of the participants, distance VA for 80.49%, and recognition ability for 90.24%. 68.29% of the participants showed significant improvements in the LVQOL scores. Improvement in recognition ability was negatively correlated with baseline recognition ability. Additionally, improvement in the LVQOL scores was correlated with age and the baseline LVQOL score. Overall, the study found that the novel HMD significantly improved visual function and vision-related quality of life for low vision patients with CVL, highlighting the potential benefits and the need for further evaluation of such devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.