ArticleScientific reports2024
Genetic investigations on singleton school aged children reveal novel variants and new candidate genes for hearing loss.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hearing loss affects around 5% of the global population. Two preliminary studies have described genetic variants in sporadic individuals with hearing loss from Pakistan. Here we extend these studies to determine the spectrum of variants in a cohort of individuals with no previous history of hearing loss. Individuals with hearing loss born to consanguineous couples were identified from special schools. Audiograms were assessed. DNA from participants negative for GJB2 pathogenic variants was subjected to exome sequencing. Data were filtered to include variants with frequencies < 0.01 in the public databases. The effects of the missense variants on respective amino acids were analyzed by using PyMol software. Among the 44 participants, hearing loss was moderate for two individuals; 14 exhibited moderately-severe hearing loss while 25 had a severe degree of hearing loss. Hearing loss was reported to have been progressive in four participants and was currently profound in three participants. Variants were unambiguously identified in 17 genes, of which the majority affected SLC26A4. CDH23, MYO15A and OTOF were other significant contributors. Deleterious variants detected in two genes suggest new associations for hearing loss. Molecular characterization of hearing loss in our cohort revealed high genetic heterogeneity with a 75% diagnostic rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.