Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39271713›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Estimation of the crop evapotranspiration for Udham Singh Nagar district using modified Priestley-Taylor model and Landsat imagery.

Anurag Satpathi, Abhishek Danodia, Salwan Ali Abed, Ajeet Singh Nain, Nadhir Al-Ansari, Rajeev Ranjan, Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma, Amel Gacem, Lamjed Mansour, Krishna Kumar Yadav

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anurag SatpathiDepartment of Agrometeorology, College of Agriculture, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, 263145, India.
Abhishek DanodiaIndian Institute of Remote Sensing, Indian Space Research Organisation, Bengaluru, India.
Salwan Ali AbedDepartment of Environment, College of Science, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Al-Qadisiyah, 58001, Iraq.
Ajeet Singh NainDepartment of Agrometeorology, College of Agriculture, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, 263145, India.
Nadhir Al-AnsariDepartment of Civil, Environmental, and Natural Resources Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, 97187, Lulea, Sweden. nadhir.alansari@ltu.se.
Rajeev RanjanDepartment of Agrometeorology, College of Agriculture, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, 263145, India.
Dinesh Kumar VishwakarmaDepartment of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, 263145, India. dinesh.vishwakarma4820@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-6995
Amel GacemDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Skikda, 21000, Skikda, Algeria.
Lamjed MansourDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Krishna Kumar YadavDepartment of Environmental Science, Parul Institute of Applied Sciences, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, 391760, India. envirokrishna@gmail.com.

Funding

King Saud University RSP 2024R75
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main challenges for utilizing daily evapotranspiration (ET) estimation in the study area revolve around the need for accurate and reliable data inputs, as well as the interpretation of ET dynamics within the context of local agricultural practices and environmental conditions. Factors such as cloud cover, atmospheric aerosols, and variations in land cover pose challenges to the precise estimation of ET from remote sensing data. This research aimed to utilize Landsat 8 and 9 datasets from the 2022-23 period in the Udham Singh Nagar district to apply the modified Priestley-Taylor (MPT) model for estimating ET. An average ET was estimated 1.33, 1.57, 1.70, 2.99, and 3.20 mm day

Indexed as

AgrometeorologyEvapotranspirationModified Priestley-Taylor Landsat

Identifiers

PMID39271713
PMCPMC11399139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.