Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39271651›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Globalization of wild capture and farmed aquatic foods.

Jessica A Gephart, Rahul Agrawal Bejarano, Kelvin Gorospe, Alex Godwin, Christopher D Golden, Rosamond L Naylor, Kirsty L Nash, Michael L Pace, Max Troell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Casting light on the workings of illegal fishing markets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Global nutritional equity of fishmeal and aquaculture trade flows.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jessica A GephartSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. gephart@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6836-9291
Rahul Agrawal BejaranoDepartment of Environmental Science, American University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3944-4149
Kelvin GorospeDepartment of Environmental Science, American University, Washington, DC, USA.
Alex GodwinDepartment of Computer Science, American University, Washington, DC, USA.
Christopher D GoldenDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2258-7493
Rosamond L NaylorDepartment of Global Environmental Policy and Center on Food Security and Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1260-3322
Kirsty L NashCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0976-3197
Michael L PaceDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Max TroellBeijer Institute of Ecological Economics, The Royal Swedish Academy of Science, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7509-8140

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 2121238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquatic foods are highly traded, with nearly 60 million tonnes exported in 2020, representing 11% of global agriculture trade by value. Despite the vast scale, basic characteristics of aquatic food trade, including species, origin, and farmed vs wild sourcing, are largely unknown due to the reporting of trade data. Consequently, we have a coarse picture of aquatic food trade and consumption patterns. Here, we present results from a database on species trade that aligns production, conversion factors, and trade to compute apparent consumption for all farmed and wild aquatic foods from 1996 to 2020. Over this period, aquatic foods became increasingly globalized, with the share of production exported increasing by 40%. Importantly, trends differ across aquatic food sectors. Global consumption also increased by 19.4% despite declining marine capture consumption, and some regions became increasingly reliant on foreign-sourced aquatic foods. To identify sustainable diet opportunities among aquatic foods, our findings, and underlying database enable a greater understanding of the role of trade in rapidly evolving aquatic food systems.

Indexed as

CommerceInternationalitySeafoodAgricultureAnimalsAquacultureFisheriesFishesFood SupplyHumans

Identifiers

PMID39271651
PMCPMC11399132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.