ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2025
Epilepsy Among School-Children in a Rural District in Northwest India: Prevalence Estimates Using Three Different Approaches.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence and incidence of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Epilepsia open · 2026Pooled it
- A primary care-led school-centered model for epilepsy detection and care among children in India.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Scaling up childhood epilepsy management: lessons from India's school health program.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2025Article
- A Community-Based Screening Tool for Childhood Epilepsy: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the INDT-EPI Tool in Punjabi-Speaking Indian Population.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2025Article
- School Children with Epilepsy: A Need for Telehealth Enabled Epilepsy Smart School Program.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo estimate and compare the prevalence of epilepsy during childhood using several approaches and also to determine whether school-based screening campaigns can capture epilepsy cases efficiently.
methodsEpilepsy prevalence determined from cases captured through the Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK), a nationwide school-health screening framework, were compared with estimates derived from school- and community-based surveys in one Indian district. Level-1 screen comprised perusal of child health registers maintained by the RBSK teams over one year to estimate the documented number of children with epilepsy; Level-2 screen comprised a questionnaire-based school survey among 10,000 school children; and Level-3 screen-a door-to-door community-based survey among 10,000 children in the district.
resultsPrevalence estimates of childhood epilepsy varied significantly across screening methods. The child health register identified lower crude and age-adjusted prevalences of 40 (95% CI, 24 to 55) and 36 (95% CI, 20 to 51)/1,00,000 vis-à-vis both the school survey [crude and age-adjusted prevalences of 354 (95% CI, 221 to 487) and 340 (95% CI, 181 to 517) per 100,000] and the community survey [crude and age-adjusted prevalences of 759 (95% CI, 591 to 927) and 746 (95% CI, 579 to 914) per 100,000]. The community survey identified 15 children with epilepsy (20%) who had dropped out of school. Also, it recaptured a small number of children previously identified by the school or child health register surveys.
conclusionsThe present findings underscore the need to scale up the capacity of public programs to screen epilepsy among school children and underline the high frequency of school dropouts among children with epilepsy in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39271629What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.