SynthesisActa neurochirurgica2024
The role of procedural factors on the outcomes of embolization followed by radiosurgery for the treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: systematic review and proportional meta-analyses.
Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultimodal therapy for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVM) with embolization followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (E + SRS) has shown varying outcomes. Its benefits over other treatment modalities have been questioned. The goal of this systematic review was to determine the factors associated with cure and complication rates of this treatment strategy.
methodsA literature search in Medline and Global Index Medicus, from inception to October 2023, was performed. Studies reporting relevant outcome data from bAVM patients treated with E + SRS were included. Data on several patient, lesion and procedure-related factors were collected. Embolization intent was classified as Targeted (of high-risk features), Devascularizing (feeder embolization/flow reduction) and Occluding (intent-to-cure, nidus embolization). The primary outcome was obliteration rate. Secondary outcomes were post-SRS bleeding (PSB), post-embolization neurological complications (PENC) and post-SRS neurological complications (PSNC). Subgroup analyses included embolic agent, embolization intent and radiosurgery type. Proportional meta-analyses and meta-regressions were performed.
resultsForty-one studies were included in the review. The pooled obliteration rate was 56.45% (95% CI 50.94 to 61.88). Meta-regression analyses showed higher obliteration rates with Copolymers and lower obliteration rates with Devascularizing embolization. The pooled PSB, PENC and PSNC rates were 5.50%, 13.75% and 5.02%, respectively. Meta-regression analyses showed higher rates of PSB, PENC and PSNC with Devascularizing embolization, Liquid & Solid embolic agents and Targeted & Devascularizing intent, respectively.
conclusionEmbolic agent and embolization intent were procedural factors associated with treatment outcomes of E + SRS in the management of bAVM patients. The efficacy and safety profiles favor copolymers as embolic agents and disfavor Devascularizing as embolization intent. STUDY REGISTRATION: The protocol of the systematic review was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42023474171.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39271583What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.