Trial reportAnnals of hematology2025
Acalabrutinib in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Primary analysis from an open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 trial.
Trial report in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03932331 (A Phase 1/2 Open Label, Multi-center Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Efficacy of Acalabrutinib in Chinese Adult Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Other B-cell Malignancies), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1/2 Open Label, Multi-center Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Efficacy of Acalabrutinib in Chinese Adult Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Other B-cell Malignancies
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acalabrutinib vs chlorambucil plus rituximab in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A randomized phase 3 Asian study.Annals of hematology · 2026Trial
- Real-World Outcomes with Orelabrutinib in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma: A Retrospective Study.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acalabrutinib is a highly selective Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in the United States and Europe for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) based on phase 3 trials with limited representation of Asian populations. This phase 1/2 trial evaluates acalabrutinib in Chinese adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL receiving acalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles until disease progression or treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) presenting substantial clinical risk. The primary endpoint was blinded independent central review (BICR)-assessed overall response rate (ORR). A total of 60 patients from 20 sites in China received acalabrutinib (median age 62 years; median 1 prior therapy line; 21.7% with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation; 51.7% with unmutated IGHV). Median total treatment duration was 19.4 months (range 0.6-28.2) with 53 patients (88.3%) receiving acalabrutinib at data cutoff; median study follow-up was 20.2 months. BICR-assessed ORR was 85.0% (95% CI, 73.4-92.9). Median duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were not reached. Estimated 12-month and 18-month PFS rates were 91.5% (95% CI, 80.9-96.4) and 78.8% (95% CI, 60.9-89.2); OS rates were both 96.7% (95% CI, 87.3-99.2). AEs of grade ≥ 3 occurred in 25 patients (41.7%), most commonly decreased neutrophil count (13.3%, n = 8), pneumonia (6.7%, n = 4), and upper respiratory tract infection (6.7%, n = 4). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 2 patients (paraneoplastic pemphigus; rectal neoplasm). This study demonstrated high ORR in acalabrutinib-treated Chinese patients with R/R CLL with no unexpected safety concerns. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03932331).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.