Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39271513›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024

Conventional versus rubber band traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center retrospective study (with video).

Jinbang Peng, Jiajia Lin, Lina Fang, Jingjing Zhou, Yaqi Song, Chaoyu Yang, Yu Zhang, Binbin Gu, Ziwei Ji, Yandi Lu and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jinbang Peng *Department of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, 150 Ximen Street, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
Jiajia Lin *Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
Lina FangEndoscopic Center, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, China.
Jingjing ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, 150 Ximen Street, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
Yaqi SongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, 150 Ximen Street, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
Chaoyu YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, 150 Ximen Street, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, 150 Ximen Street, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
Binbin GuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, 150 Ximen Street, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
Ziwei JiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, 150 Ximen Street, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
Yandi LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, 150 Ximen Street, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
Xinli MaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, 150 Ximen Street, Linhai, Zhejiang, China. maoxl@enzemed.com.
Lingling YanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, 150 Ximen Street, Linhai, Zhejiang, China. yanll9477@enzemed.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5103-9886

Funding

Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province 2023KY1312Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province 2024KY1792Program of Taizhou Science and Technology Grant 22ywb08Program of Taizhou Science and Technology Grant 22ywb14Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province 22PY101Scientific Research Fund Program of Enze Medical Center 22EZB12Scientific Research Fund Program of Enze Medical Center 22EZC17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of gastrointestinal tumors, including rectal neuroendocrine tumors (r-NETs). However, the relative advantages of traction-assisted ESD for the treatment of small rectal lesions are still debated.

aimsWe conducted a study to compare the efficacy and safety of rubber band traction-assisted ESD (RBT-ESD) to conventional ESD (C-ESD).

methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with r-NET treated with ESD between October 2021 and October 2023. Our study assessed differences between the groups in the complete resection rate of lesions, muscular layer injury, surgical complications, operation time, resection speed, time to liquid diet, postoperative hospital stay, hospital cost, and recurrence rate.

resultsA total of 119 patients with r-NETs participated in this study (RBT-ESD group, n = 27; C-ESD group, n = 92). The operation time in RBT-ESD group was shorter than in C-ESD group, but the difference was not statistically significant (16.0 min [9.0-22.0 min] vs. 18.0 min [13.3-27.0 min], P = 0.056). However, the resection speed was significantly faster in the RBT-ESD group (6.7 vs. 4.1 mm

conclusionFor r-NETs of < 2 cm in size, the RBT method did not significantly shorten the operation time but resulted in faster resection speed, less muscular layer injury, and earlier postoperative recovery to a liquid diet.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionNeuroendocrine TumorsOperative TimeRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTractionTreatment OutcomeEndoscopic submucosal dissectionMuscular layer injuryRectal neuroendocrine tumorsResection speedRubber band traction

Identifiers

PMID39271513
PMCPMC11525419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.