ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024
Trajectory patterns and factors associated with acceptance of disability in young and middle-aged breast cancer patients: a longitudinal study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trajectory patterns and factors associated with shoulder-related quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer after neck dissection: A longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo explore the trajectories of acceptance of disability in young and middle-aged breast cancer patients based on a latent class growth analysis, investigate factors associated with each trajectory, and identify whether return to normal living differs in different trajectories.
methodsYoung and middle-aged patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent surgery were followed up at baseline, and 1, 3, and 6 months in China. Participants completed sociodemographic information questionnaires, the Adaptation of Disability Scale Revised, and the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. A latent class growth analysis was used to explore the trajectories of acceptance of disability.
resultsAmong 212 patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer, the mean age of patients was 45.44 years. The majority of participants were with invasive carcinoma (77.8%). Three classes were identified: high acceptance of disability increasing group (high-increasing, 13.7%), moderate acceptance of disability stable group (moderate-stable, 67.9%), and moderate acceptance of disability decreasing group (moderate-decreasing, 18.3%). Being unemployed or retired and receiving endocrine therapy are risk factors associated with acceptance of disability. Carcinoma in situ is a protective factor associated with acceptance of disability. Participants diagnosed with carcinoma in situ and who not receive endocrine therapy were more likely to be in high-increasing group. Unemployed participants before surgery were more likely to be in moderate-decreasing group. Moreover, the Reintegration to Normal Living Index scores had significant differences from baseline to 6 months of follow-up. The high-increasing group had the highest average Reintegration to Normal Living Index scores than the moderate-stable group and the moderate-decreasing group, showing similar patterns at four timepoints.
conclusionWe identified three trajectories of acceptance of disability. Dynamic and individualized intervention should be continuously provided to ensure patients acquire adequate medical resources to comprehensively increase acceptance of disability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39271485What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.