ArticleGenome research2024
Long-read DNA and cDNA sequencing identify cancer-predisposing deep intronic variation in tumor-suppressor genes.
Article in Genome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation structures for sequence variants of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- Sequencing approaches in hereditary cancer testing: strengths, limitations and future directions.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- Reply to Chi et al.: DefiningProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- The role of non-coding variants in hereditary cancer syndromes: mechanistic insights and clinical implications.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Investigating the contribution of rare non-coding variants in BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 to hereditary breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Oxford Nanopore Technologies [ONT] Sequencing: Clinical Validation in Genetically Heterogeneous Disorders.Genes · 2025Article
- Long-read DNA and RNA sequencing for inherited polyposis and colorectal cancer: cryptic intronic variants and multiple mutational mechanisms.Journal of medical genetics · 2025Article
- A series of reviews in familial cancer: genetic cancer risk in context variants of uncertain significance in MMR genes: which procedures should be followed?Familial cancer · 2025Review
- Unraveling the hidden complexity of cancer through long-read sequencing.Genome research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The vast majority of deeply intronic genomic variants are benign, but some extremely rare or private deep intronic variants lead to exonification of intronic sequence with abnormal transcriptional consequences. Damaging variants of this class are likely underreported as causes of disease for several reasons: Most clinical DNA and RNA testing does not include full intronic sequences; many of these variants lie in complex repetitive regions that cannot be aligned from short-read whole-genome sequence; and, until recently, consequences of deep intronic variants were not accurately predicted by in silico tools. We evaluated the frequency and consequences of rare deep intronic variants for families severely affected with breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and/or metastatic prostate cancer, but with no causal variant identified by any previous genomic or cDNA-based approach. For 10 tumor-suppressor genes, we used multiplexed adaptive sampling long-read DNA sequencing and cDNA sequencing, based on patient-derived DNA and RNA, to systematically evaluate deep intronic variation. We identified all variants across the full genomic loci of targeted genes, applied the in silico tools SpliceAI and Pangolin to predict variants of functional consequence, and then carried out long-read cDNA sequencing to identify aberrant transcripts. For eight of the 120 (6%) previously unsolved families, rare deep intronic variants in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.