ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2024
Refining Estimation of the Instantaneous Reproduction Number During Early Pandemic Stages: Addressing Case-Reporting Variability and Serial Interval Uncertainty.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During infectious disease outbreaks, estimates for the instantaneous reproduction number, R(t), are essential for understanding transmission dynamics. This study develops and analyzes new methodology to improve estimation of R(t) when observed case counts are subject to reporting patterns and available serial interval estimates are subject to uncertainty and non-representativeness. Specifically, we developed a Bayesian time-since-infection model with layers to adjust for reporting measurement error, integrate multiple candidate serial interval estimates, and estimate transmission with an autoregressive time-series model incorporating factors relevant to transmission. Additionally, we provide practical tools to identify reporting patterns and determine when to smooth case counts for more usable R(t) estimates. We evaluated model performance relative to widely adopted methodology by simulating outbreak data, finding improved R(t) estimation with the proposed methodology. We also used 2020 COVID-19 data to analyze transmission trends and predictors, identifying strong day-of-week and social distancing effects that subsequently reduced estimate volatility. In addition to new approaches for addressing serial interval uncertainty and incorporating transmission predictor information, this study provides an alternative approach for addressing case-reporting patterns without delaying detection or smoothing over relevant transmission signals. These tools and findings may be used or built upon for current and future outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.