Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39270676›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2024

Receptive-field nonlinearities in primary auditory cortex: a comparative perspective.

Natsumi Y Homma, Jermyn Z See, Craig A Atencio, Congcong Hu, Joshua D Downer, Ralph E Beitel, Steven W Cheung, Mina Sadeghi Najafabadi, Timothy Olsen, James Bigelow and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Natsumi Y HommaJohn & Edward Coleman Memorial Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jermyn Z SeeJohn & Edward Coleman Memorial Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Craig A AtencioJohn & Edward Coleman Memorial Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Congcong HuJohn & Edward Coleman Memorial Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Joshua D DownerJohn & Edward Coleman Memorial Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ralph E BeitelJohn & Edward Coleman Memorial Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Steven W CheungJohn & Edward Coleman Memorial Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mina Sadeghi NajafabadiJohn & Edward Coleman Memorial Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Timothy OlsenJohn & Edward Coleman Memorial Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
James BigelowJohn & Edward Coleman Memorial Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Andrea R HasenstaubJohn & Edward Coleman Memorial Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Brian J MaloneJohn & Edward Coleman Memorial Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Christoph E SchreinerJohn & Edward Coleman Memorial Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4571-4328

Funding

FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF PRIMARY AUDITORY CORTEXR01DC002260 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SCHREINER, CHRISTOPH E. · 1995 to 2020
$9.2M
Auditory Cortical Processing in Hearing LossR01DC017396 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SCHREINER, CHRISTOPH E. · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Coleman Memorial FundHearing Research IncJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceKlingenstein FoundationNIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002260NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017396NIH HHS DC002260PBBR Breakthrough Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical processing of auditory information can be affected by interspecies differences as well as brain states. Here we compare multifeature spectro-temporal receptive fields (STRFs) and associated input/output functions or nonlinearities (NLs) of neurons in primary auditory cortex (AC) of four mammalian species. Single-unit recordings were performed in awake animals (female squirrel monkeys, female, and male mice) and anesthetized animals (female squirrel monkeys, rats, and cats). Neuronal responses were modeled as consisting of two STRFs and their associated NLs. The NLs for the STRF with the highest information content show a broad distribution between linear and quadratic forms. In awake animals, we find a higher percentage of quadratic-like NLs as opposed to more linear NLs in anesthetized animals. Moderate sex differences of the shape of NLs were observed between male and female unanesthetized mice. This indicates that the core AC possesses a rich variety of potential computations, particularly in awake animals, suggesting that multiple computational algorithms are at play to enable the auditory system's robust recognition of auditory events.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAcoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsAuditory PerceptionCatsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, NeurologicalNeuronsRatsSaimiriSpecies Specificityanesthesiaauditory cortexcomplex cellsnonlinearityreceptive fields

Identifiers

PMID39270676
PMCPMC11398879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.