ArticleStem cell reports2024
SeqVerify: An accessible analysis tool for cell line genomic integrity, contamination, and gene editing outcomes.
Article in Stem cell reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- De-extinction technology and its application to conservation.The Journal of heredity · 2026Review
- Initiation of meiosis from human iPSCs under defined conditions through identification of regulatory factors.Science advances · 2025Article
- Research progress of stem cells in the treatment of atherosclerosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Induction of Meiosis from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the last decade, advances in genome editing and pluripotent stem cell (PSC) culture have let researchers generate edited PSC lines to study a wide variety of biological questions. However, abnormalities in cell lines such as aneuploidy, mutations, on-target and off-target editing errors, and microbial contamination can arise during PSC culture or due to undesired editing outcomes. The ongoing decline of next-generation sequencing prices has made whole-genome sequencing (WGS) a promising option for detecting these abnormalities. However, this approach has been held back by a lack of easily usable data analysis software. Here, we present SeqVerify, a computational pipeline designed to take raw WGS data and a list of intended genome edits, and verify that the edits are present and that there are no abnormalities. We anticipate that SeqVerify will be a useful tool for researchers generating edited PSCs, and more broadly, for cell line quality control in general.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.