Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39270010›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025

4D flow MRI velocity uncertainty quantification.

Sean M Rothenberger, Jiacheng Zhang, Michael Markl, Bruce A Craig, Pavlos P Vlachos, Vitaliy L Rayz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Determinants and propagation of velocity uncertainty in 2D phase-contrast MRI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sean M RothenbergerWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1341-6147
Jiacheng ZhangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9027-6531
Michael MarklDepartment of Radiology at the Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Bruce A CraigDepartment of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Pavlos P VlachosWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Vitaliy L RayzWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.

Funding

Risk Assessment of Cerebral Aneurysm Growth with 4D flow MRIR01HL115267 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ANSARI, SAMEER A, LAWTON, MICHAEL T · 2013 to 2023
$4.2M
Multi-modality 4D Flow MRI data enhancement for quantification of cerebral aneurysms hemodynamicsR21NS106696 · NINDS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI RAYZ, VITALIY L, SCHNELL, SUSANNE · 2018 to 2019
$419k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL115267NHLBI NIH HHS R21 NS106696NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS106696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAn automatic method is presented for estimating 4D flow MRI velocity measurement uncertainty in each voxel. The velocity distance (VD) metric, a statistical distance between the measured velocity and local error distribution, is introduced as a novel measure of 4D flow MRI velocity measurement quality.

methodsThe method uses mass conservation to assess the local velocity error variance and the standardized difference of means (SDM) velocity to estimate the velocity error correlations. VD is evaluated as the Mahalanobis distance between the local velocity measurement and the local error distribution. The uncertainty model is validated synthetically and tested in vitro under different flow resolutions and noise levels. The VD's application is demonstrated on two in vivo thoracic vasculature 4D flow datasets.

resultsSynthetic results show the proposed uncertainty quantification method is sensitive to aliased regions across various velocity-to-noise ratios and assesses velocity error correlations in four- and six-point acquisitions with correlation errors at or under 3.2%. In vitro results demonstrate the method's sensitivity to spatial resolution, venc settings, partial volume effects, and phase wrapping error sources. Applying VD to assess in vivo 4D flow MRI in the aorta demonstrates the expected increase in measured velocity quality with contrast administration and systolic flow.

conclusionThe proposed 4D flow MRI uncertainty quantification method assesses velocity measurement error owing to sources including noise, intravoxel phase dispersion, and velocity aliasing. This method enables rigorous comparison of 4D flow MRI datasets obtained in longitudinal studies, across patient populations, and with different MRI systems.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImaging, Three-DimensionalBlood Flow VelocityHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificityhemodynamicsmagnetic resonance velocimetry (MRV)phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC‐MRI)

Identifiers

PMID39270010
PMCPMC12450529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.