Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269964›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Different estimation methods of the modified Kies Topp-Leone model with applications and quantile regression.

Safar M Alghamdi, Olayan Albalawi, Sanaa Mohammed Almarzouki, Vasili B V Nagarjuna, Suleman Nasiru, Mohammed Elgarhy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Safar M AlghamdiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Olayan AlbalawiDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7772-0386
Sanaa Mohammed AlmarzoukiStatistics Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Vasili B V NagarjunaDepartment of Mathematics Vellore Institute of Technology Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7998-9864
Suleman NasiruDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, School of Mathematical Sciences, C. K. Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-6652-4251
Mohammed ElgarhyMathematics and Computer Science Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-1333-3862

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper introduces the modified Kies Topp-Leone (MKTL) distribution for modeling data on the (0, 1) or [0, 1] interval. The shapes of the density and hazard rate functions manifest desirable shapes, making the MKTL distribution suitable for modeling data with different characteristics at the unit interval. Twelve different estimation methods are utilized to estimate the distribution parameters, and Monte Carlo simulation experiments are executed to assess the performance of the methods. The simulation results suggest that the maximum likelihood method is the superior method. The usefulness of the new distribution is illustrated by utilizing three data sets, and its performance is juxtaposed with that of other competing models. The findings affirm the superiority of the MKTL distribution over the other candidate models. Applying the developed quantile regression model using the new distribution disclosed that it offers a competitive fit over other existing regression models.

Indexed as

Monte Carlo MethodAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansLikelihood FunctionsModels, StatisticalRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID39269964
PMCPMC11398704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.