Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269963›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Immunogenicity and real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in Lebanon: Insights from primary and booster schemes, variants, infections, and hospitalization.

Rima Moghnieh, Wajdi Haddad, Nayla Jbeily, Salam El-Hassan, Shadi Eid, Hicham Baba, Marilyne Sily, Yara Saber, Dania Abdallah, Abdul Rahman Bizri and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rima MoghniehDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Lebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0003-3818-7555
Wajdi HaddadDepartment of Internal Medicine, Central Military Hospital, Military Healthcare, Lebanese Army, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nayla JbeilyHead of Laboratory Department, FMPS Holding S.A.L., Beirut, Lebanon.
Salam El-HassanNursing Office, Makassed General Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Shadi EidGilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon.
Hicham BabaGilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon.
Marilyne SilyGilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon.
Yara SaberLaboratory Department, FMPS Holding S.A.L., Beirut, Lebanon.
Dania AbdallahPharmacy Department, Makassed General Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Abdul Rahman BizriAmerican University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mohamed H SayeghAmerican University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we conducted a case-control investigation to assess the immunogenicity and effectiveness of primary and first booster homologous and heterologous COVID-19 vaccination regimens against infection and hospitalization, targeting variants circulating in Lebanon during 2021-2022. The study population comprised active Lebanese military personnel between February 2021 and September 2022. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated hospitalization was retrospectively determined during different variant-predominant periods using a case-control study design. Vaccines developed by Sinopharm, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca as well as Sputnik V were analyzed. Prospective assessment of humoral immune response, which was measured based on the SARS-CoV-2 antispike receptor binding domain IgG titer, was performed post vaccination at various time points, focusing on Sinopharm and Pfizer vaccines. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS and GraphPad Prism. COVID-19 VE remained consistently high before the emergence of the Omicron variant, with lower estimates during the Delta wave than those during the Alpha wave for primary vaccination schemes. However, vaccines continued to offer significant protection against infection. VE estimates consistently decreased for the Omicron variant across post-vaccination timeframes and schemes. VE against hospitalization declined over time and was influenced by the variant. No breakthrough infections progressed to critical or fatal COVID-19. Immunogenicity analysis revealed that the homologous Pfizer regimen elicited a stronger humoral response than Sinopharm, while a heterologous Sinopharm/Pfizer regimen yielded comparable results to the Pfizer regimen. Over time, both Sinopharm's and Pfizer's primary vaccination schemes exhibited decreased humoral immunity titers, with Pfizer being a more effective booster than Sinopharm. This study, focusing on healthy young adults, provides insights into VE during different pandemic waves. Continuous research and monitoring are essential for understanding vaccine-mediated immune responses under evolving circumstances.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHospitalizationImmunization, SecondarySARS-CoV-2AdultAntibodies, ViralCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansImmunity, HumoralImmunogenicity, VaccineLebanonMaleMilitary PersonnelRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID39269963
PMCPMC11398646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.