ArticlePloS one2024
Assessing the cost barrier for small and medium food processing businesses to meet Preventive Controls for Human Foods standards.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Preventive Controls for Human Food Rule regulation under the Food Safety Modernization Act sets new food safety standards. Both food safety educators and small and medium sized food processing businesses that manufacture certain value-added or processed foods lack knowledge regarding costs to prepare, implement, and manage ongoing food safety practices under the new standards. Current food safety training materials do not acknowledge costs or provide content addressing potential costs, and food safety educators do not have information needed to guide development of relevant materials that address costs. We combine economics and food science principles and use mixed methods to identify and estimate cost barriers for food processing businesses through an interdisciplinary research and extension project in the Northeast U.S. We first modify Preventive Controls extension programming to acknowledge costs and test how modified programming improves self-reported knowledge about costs. Materials that acknowledge that costs are associated with meeting standards significantly increases participants' self-reported perceived knowledge of costs by 1.3 points on a 1-to-5-point Likert scale. Compared with programming areas in which detailed content is provided, however, improvements in knowledge of costs lags behind overall knowledge gains (3.2 for costs versus 4.1 for food safety content). To fill this content gap, we next conduct semi-structured group interviews with a subset of participants (N = 10), develop a costs analysis framework, and measure actual costs associated with Preventive Controls. We find that initial costs average $20,000 per business to plan, implement, and manage standards, and almost $8,000 in every subsequent year to manage. We demonstrate that even modest interventions can reduce cost barriers for businesses seeking to meet compliance standards. We provide food safety educators with concrete cost information to support businesses to pursue Preventive Controls standards. Study results imply that low-cost methods could improve food safety in mid-scale supply chains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.