Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269930›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

"Goldmine" or "big mess"? An interview study on the challenges of designing, operating, and ensuring the durability of Clinical Data Warehouses in France and Belgium.

Sonia Priou, Emmanuelle Kempf, Marija Jankovic, Guillaume Lamé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sonia PriouCentraleSupélec, Laboratoire de Génie Industriel, Université Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Emmanuelle KempfDepartment of Medical Oncology, Université Paris Est Créteil, AP-HP, CHU Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier, 94000 Créteil, France.
Marija JankovicCentraleSupélec, Laboratoire de Génie Industriel, Université Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Guillaume LaméCentraleSupélec, Laboratoire de Génie Industriel, Université Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9514-1890

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesClinical Data Warehouses (CDW) are the designated infrastructures to enable access and analysis of large quantities of electronic health record data. Building and managing such systems implies extensive "data work" and coordination between multiple stakeholders. Our study focuses on the challenges these stakeholders face when designing, operating, and ensuring the durability of CDWs for research. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted semistructured interviews with 21 professionals working with CDWs from France and Belgium. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded inductively.

resultsPrompted by the AI boom, healthcare institutions launched initiatives to repurpose data they were generating for care without a clear vision of how to generate value. Difficulties in operating CDWs arose quickly, strengthened by the multiplicity and diversity of stakeholders involved and grand discourses on the possibilities of CDWs, disjointed from their actual capabilities. Without proper management of the information flows, stakeholders struggled to build a shared vision. This was evident in our interviewees' contrasting appreciations of what mattered most to ensure data quality. Participants explained they struggled to manage knowledge inside and across institutions, generating knowledge loss, repeated mistakes, and impeding progress locally and nationally. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionManagement issues strongly affect the deployment and operation of CDWs. This may stem from a simplistic linear vision of how this type of infrastructure operates. CDWs remain promising for research, and their design, implementation, and operation require careful management if they are to be successful. Building on innovation management, complex systems, and organizational learning knowledge will help.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsInterviews as TopicBelgiumData ManagementFranceHumansClinical Data Warehouseelectronic health recordsinterviewsmedical informaticsqualitative researchreal-world data

Identifiers

PMID39269930
PMCPMC11491596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.