Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269823›Full record

ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2024

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a biomarker of response to therapy in advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with Nivolumab.

Yehia I Mohamed, Sunyoung S Lee, Tarik Demir, Shadi Chamseddine, Zishuo Ian Hu, Lianchun Xiao, Khaled Elsayes, Jeffrey S Morris, Robert A Wolff, Rikita Hiatia and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Emerging Immune-Based Therapeutic Strategies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Yehia I MohamedDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Sunyoung S LeeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Tarik DemirDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Shadi ChamseddineDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Zishuo Ian HuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Lianchun XiaoDepartment of Biostatistics, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Khaled ElsayesDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Jeffrey S MorrisDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.
Robert A WolffDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Rikita HiatiaDepartment of Epidemiology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Aliya QayyumDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Asif RashidDepartment of Pathology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Dan G DudaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Steele Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
James C YaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Michael LaPelusaDivision of Cancer Medicine, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Eugene J KoayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Armeen MahvashDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ahmed Al AzzamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Steele Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ecaterina E DumbravaDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Manal HassanDepartment of Epidemiology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Hesham M AminDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Ahmed Omar KasebDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in Hepatocellular CarcinomaP50CA217674 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BERETTA, LAURA, KASEB, AHMED · 2019 to 2023
$11.3M
Bayesian Network-Based Integrative Genomics Methods for Precision MedicineR01CA244845 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BALADANDAYUTHAPANI, VEERABHADRAN, MORRIS, JEFFREY S · 2021 to 2024
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA217674NCI NIH HHS R01 CA244845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising non-invasive marker for detection, diagnosis, treatment selection, and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

objectiveThis study aimed to examine the utility of ctDNA as a prognostic and predictive tool in HCC patients treated with nivolumab.

methodsWe analyzed pre-treatment ctDNA from 44 HCC patients using comprehensive genomic testing on a commercially available platform. We utilized log rank test and univariate Cox models to correlate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with ctDNA expressions.

resultsOf 44 patients, 77.3% were men with median age of 67 years. All but 3 patients had at least one alteration identified, and TP53 was the most commonly altered gene (52.3%). Median OS was 17.5 months (95% CI: 12.7, NA). Mutations involving PIK3CA, BRCA1, and CCND1 amplification were associated with shorter OS (P 0.0001, 0.0001 and 0.01, respectively). Median PFS time was 4.01 months (95% CI: 3.06, 9.33). Mutations involving KIT and PIK3CA were associated with shorter PFS (P 0.0001 and 0.0004, respectively), while mutation involving CTNNB1 were associated with longer PFS (p= 0.04).

conclusionsctDNA profiling may provide a benefit for prediction of survival and progression of HCC patients treated with nivolumab. Future studies are needed for confirmation.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularCirculating Tumor DNALiver NeoplasmsNivolumabAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrognosisAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNANivolumabbiomarkerctDNAhepatocellular carcinomaimmunotherapynivolumab

Identifiers

PMID39269823
PMCPMC11491993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.