Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269798›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence2024

Mine Your Own Anatomy: Revisiting Medical Image Segmentation With Extremely Limited Labels.

Chenyu You, Weicheng Dai, Fenglin Liu, Yifei Min, Nicha C Dvornek, Xiaoxiao Li, David A Clifton, Lawrence Staib, James S Duncan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Catheter detection and segmentation in X-ray images via multi-task learning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. ACTION++: Improving Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation with Adaptive Anatomical Contrast.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2023
    Article
  19. Implicit Anatomical Rendering for Medical Image Segmentation with Stochastic Experts.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chenyu You
Weicheng Dai
Fenglin Liu
Yifei Min
Nicha C Dvornek
Xiaoxiao Li
David A Clifton
Lawrence Staib
James S Duncan

Funding

Subnetwork-based Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers for Therapy Assessment in AutismR01NS035193 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JAMES S DUNCAN, LAWRENCE H. STAIB · 1996 to 2026
$9.2M
q4DE: A Biomarker for Image-Guided, Post-MI Hydrogel TherapyR01HL121226 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DUNCAN, JAMES S, O'DONNELL, MATTHEW · 2014 to 2022
$6.3M
Quantitative Multimodal Imaging Biomarkers for Combined Locoregional and Immunotherapy of Liver CancerR01CA206180 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAPIRO, JULIUS, DUNCAN, JAMES S · 2016 to 2025
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA206180NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL121226NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies on contrastive learning have achieved remarkable performance solely by leveraging few labels in the context of medical image segmentation. Existing methods mainly focus on instance discrimination and invariant mapping (i.e., pulling positive samples closer and negative samples apart in the feature space). However, they face three common pitfalls: (1) tailness: medical image data usually follows an implicit long-tail class distribution. Blindly leveraging all pixels in training hence can lead to the data imbalance issues, and cause deteriorated performance; (2) consistency: it remains unclear whether a segmentation model has learned meaningful and yet consistent anatomical features due to the intra-class variations between different anatomical features; and (3) diversity: the intra-slice correlations within the entire dataset have received significantly less attention. This motivates us to seek a principled approach for strategically making use of the dataset itself to discover similar yet distinct samples from different anatomical views. In this paper, we introduce a novel semi-supervised 2D medical image segmentation framework termed Mine yOur owNAnatomy (MONA), and make three contributions. First, prior work argues that every pixel equally matters to the model training; we observe empirically that this alone is unlikely to define meaningful anatomical features, mainly due to lacking the supervision signal. We show two simple solutions towards learning invariances-through the use of stronger data augmentations and nearest neighbors. Second, we construct a set of objectives that encourage the model to be capable of decomposing medical images into a collection of anatomical features in an unsupervised manner. Lastly, we both empirically and theoretically, demonstrate the efficacy of our MONA on three benchmark datasets with different labeled settings, achieving new state-of-the-art under different labeled semi-supervised settings. MONA makes minimal assumptions on domain expertise, and hence constitutes a practical and versatile solution in medical image analysis. We provide the PyTorch-like pseudo-code in supplementary.

Identifiers

PMID39269798
PMCPMC11903367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.