Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269775›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Hierarchical communities in the larval

Richard Betzel, Maria Grazia Puxeddu, Caio Seguin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sexual dimorphism in the complete connectome of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. The intrinsic neuronal network of the central nervous system and its modular (subsystem) architecture in a mammal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard BetzelDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401.
Maria Grazia PuxedduDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401.ORCID 0000-0001-8725-465X
Caio SeguinDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the longstanding aims of network neuroscience is to link a connectome's topological properties-i.e., features defined from connectivity alone-with an organism's neurobiology. One approach for doing so is to compare connectome properties with annotational maps. This type of analysis is popular at the meso-/macroscale, but is less common at the nano-scale, owing to a paucity of neuron-level connectome data. However, recent methodological advances have made possible the reconstruction of whole-brain connectomes at single-neuron resolution for a select set of organisms. These include the fruit fly,

Indexed as

BrainConnectomeDrosophila melanogasterLarvaAnimalsInterneuronsNerve NetNeuronscommunity structureconnectomeDrosophilanetwork neurosciencenetwork science

Identifiers

PMID39269775
PMCPMC11420166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.