Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269748›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

Supporting Carers: Study Protocol of a Meta-Review of Psychosocial Interventions for Carers of People With Cancer.

Brona Nic Giolla Easpaig, Bronwyn Newman, Judith Johnson, Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell, Ursula M Sansom-Daly, Lucy Jones, Lukas Hofstätter, Eden G Robertson, Stephen Mears, Kabir Sattarshetty and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Adapting a Preparatory Skills-Building Programme for Carers of People With Cancer Through Co-Design: The iCanSupport Project.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Brona Nic Giolla EaspaigSchool of Nursing, Charles Darwin University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6787-056X
Bronwyn NewmanAustralian Institute for Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5147-7381
Judith JohnsonSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0431-013X
Rebekah Laidsaar-PowellPsycho-Oncology Co-Operative Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3462-5645
Ursula M Sansom-DalySchool of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Paediatrics & Child Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4200-8900
Lucy JonesNeuroblastoma Australia, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0009-0005-6788-6234
Lukas HofstätterCarers New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7694-3975
Eden G RobertsonSchool of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Paediatrics & Child Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9395-7896
Stephen MearsAustralian Institute for Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-3506-9490
Kabir SattarshettySchool of Nursing, Charles Darwin University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-5400-1248
Reema HarrisonAustralian Institute for Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8609-9827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile there is a clear need for psychosocial interventions that promote the well-being of carers of patients with cancer, the corresponding evidence base is disparate, complex, and difficult for end users to navigate and interpret. Carers remain undersupported with a lack of dedicated, effective, evidence-based programs. We will conduct a meta-review to synthesize this evidence and determine the state of science in this field.

objectiveThis study aims to address the question, "what psychosocial interventions are available to promote the well-being of carers for people with cancer?"

methodsA meta-review will synthesize the relevant reviews of psychosocial interventions that have been developed and evaluated with carers for people with cancer. A total of 4 electronic databases (PsycInfo, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) will be searched for reviews published between January 2013 and December 2023. A team-based approach will be taken for screening and assessment of the returned records against the eligibility criteria to determine inclusion. Included reviews will be critically appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses. Relevant data on study characteristics, carer and patient populations, intervention details, and psychosocial outcomes will be extracted, synthesized, and the findings will be presented in a narrative format.

resultsIt is anticipated that the study will be completed by October 2024.

conclusionsEnsuring that carers have access to evidence-based programs that promote their well-being as they care for loved ones is critical. This meta-review will contribute to program development and translation efforts by providing a clear picture of the intervention evidence base of carers of patients with cancer and identifying notable strengths, weaknesses, and gaps across the literature. The findings are anticipated to offer future directions to advance research in the field.

trial registrationPROSPERO (CRD42023403219); https://tinyurl.com/4tnzv49s. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/56403.

Indexed as

CaregiversNeoplasmsPsychosocial InterventionHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicQuality of LifeSystematic Reviews as Topiccancercaregivercaregiverscarercarersend-usersevidence-basedevidence-based programmental healthpsychosocialpsychosocial interventionsstudy protocolsupportive interventionwell-beingwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID39269748
PMCPMC11437216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.