Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269739›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2024

Use of Creative Frameworks in Health Care to Solve Data and Information Problems: Scoping Review.

Elisabeth Veronica Mess, Frank Kramer, Julia Krumme, Nico Kanelakis, Alexandra Teynor

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisabeth Veronica MessInstitute for Agile Software Development, Technical University of Applied Sciences Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1205-9141
Frank KramerChair of IT Infrastructure for Translational Medical Research, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2857-7122
Julia KrummeInstitute for Agile Software Development, Technical University of Applied Sciences Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1185-7574
Nico KanelakisTechnical University of Applied Sciences Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-2392-157X
Alexandra TeynorInstitute for Agile Software Development, Technical University of Applied Sciences Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8141-0428

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigitization is vital for data management, especially in health care. However, problems still hinder health care stakeholders in their daily work while collecting, processing, and providing health data or information. Data are missing, incorrect, cannot be collected, or information is inadequately presented. These problems can be seen as data or information problems. A proven way to elicit requirements for (software) systems is by using creative frameworks (eg, user-centered design, design thinking, lean UX [user experience], or service design) or creative methods (eg, mind mapping, storyboarding, 6 thinking hats, or interaction room). However, to what extent they are used to solve data or information-related problems in health care is unclear.

objectiveThe primary objective of this scoping review is to investigate the use of creative frameworks in addressing data and information problems in health care.

methodsFollowing JBI guidelines and the PRISMA-ScR framework, this paper analyzes selected papers, answering whether creative frameworks addressed health care data or information problems. Focusing on data problems (elicitation or collection, processing) and information problems (provision or visualization), the review examined German and English papers published between 2018 and 2022 using keywords related to "data," "design," and "user-centered." The database SCOPUS was used.

resultsOf the 898 query results, only 23 papers described a data or information problem and a creative method to solve it. These were included in the follow-up analysis and divided into different problem categories: data collection (n=7), data processing (n=1), information visualization (n=11), and mixed problems meaning data and information problem present (n=4). The analysis showed that most identified problems fall into the information visualization category. This could indicate that creative frameworks are particularly suitable for solving information or visualization problems and less for other, more abstract areas such as data problems. The results also showed that most researchers applied a creative framework after they knew what specific (data or information) problem they had (n=21). Only a minority chose a creative framework to identify a problem and realize it was a data or information problem (n=2). In response to these findings, the paper discusses the need for a new approach that addresses health care data and information challenges by promoting collaboration, iterative feedback, and user-centered development.

conclusionsAlthough the potential of creative frameworks is undisputed, applying these in solving data and information problems is a minority. To harness this potential, a suitable method needs to be developed to support health care system stakeholders. This method could be the User-Centered Data Approach.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareCreativityData ManagementHumansUser-Centered Designcreative frameworksdata and information problemsdata collectiondata processingdata provisionhealth careinformation visualizationinterdisciplinary teamsuser-centered data designuser-centered designuser-centric development

Identifiers

PMID39269739
PMCPMC11437220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.