Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269658›Full record

ArticlePlanta2024

Bio-control of soil-borne virus infection by seed application of Glycyrrhiza glabra extract and the rhamnolipid Rhapynal.

Viktoria Fomitcheva, Claudia J Strauch, Sabine Bonse, Petra Bauer, Thomas Kühne, Annette Niehl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Viktoria FomitchevaInstitute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Messeweg 11-12, Brunswick, Germany.
Claudia J StrauchInstitute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Messeweg 11-12, Brunswick, Germany.
Sabine BonseInstitute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Messeweg 11-12, Brunswick, Germany.
Petra BauerInstitute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Messeweg 11-12, Brunswick, Germany.
Thomas KühneInstitute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Messeweg 11-12, Brunswick, Germany.
Annette NiehlInstitute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Messeweg 11-12, Brunswick, Germany. Annette.niehl@julius-kuehn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0566-1401

Funding

Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft 2219NR392Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft 2221NR036A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionSeed-application of the natural products protects sugar beet and wheat plants against infection with plasmodiophorid-transmitted viruses and thus may represent an efficient, environmentally friendly, easy and cost effective biocontrol strategy. In times of intensive agriculture, resource shortening and climate change, alternative, more sustainable and eco-friendly plant protection strategies are required. Here, we tested the potential of the natural plant substances Glycyrrhiza glabra leaf extract (GE) and the rhamnolipid Rhapynal (Rha) applied to seeds to protect against infection of sugar beet and wheat with soil-borne plant viruses. The soil-borne Polymyxa betae- and Polymyxa graminis-transmitted viruses cause extensive crop losses in agriculture and efficient control strategies are missing. We show that GE and Rha both efficiently protect plants against infection with soil-borne viruses in sugar beet and wheat when applied to seeds. Moreover, the antiviral protection effect is independent of the cultivar used. No protection against Polymyxa sp. was observed after seed treatment with the bio-substances at our analysis time points. However, when we applied the bio-substances directly to soil a significant anti-Polymyxa graminis effect was obtained in roots of barley plants grown in the soil as well as in the treated soil. Despite germination can be affected by high concentrations of the substances, a range of antiviral protection conditions with no effect on germination were identified. Seed-treatment with the bio-substances did not negatively affect plant growth and development in virus-containing soil, but was rather beneficial for plant growth. We conclude that seed treatment with GE and Rha may represent an efficient, ecologically friendly, non-toxic, easy to apply and cost efficient biocontrol measure against soil-borne virus infection in plants.

Indexed as

Beta vulgarisGlycyrrhizaPlant DiseasesPlant ExtractsSeedsGlycolipidsHordeumPlant RootsPlant VirusesPlasmodiophoridaSoilSoil MicrobiologyTriticumGlycolipidsGlycyrrhiza glabra extractPlant ExtractsrhamnolipidSoilBio-substanceEnvironmentally friendly virus controlPlant protectionPolymyxa betaePolymyxa graminisSeed-treatmentSoil-treatmentSugar beetWheat

Identifiers

PMID39269658
PMCPMC11399307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.