Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269619›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

MRI-DWI detection of residual cholesteatoma: moving toward an optimum follow-up scheme.

Maura C Eggink, Maarten J F de Wolf, Fenna A Ebbens, Maartje M L de Win, Frederik G Dikkers, Erik van Spronsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Modeling residual cholesteatoma growth rate: a meta-analysis of individual participant data.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Medical outcomes after canal wall-down mastoidectomy, external ear canal reconstruction, tympanoplasty, and mastoid obliteration for extensive cholesteatoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maura C EgginkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.c.eggink@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0187-5696
Maarten J F de WolfDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fenna A EbbensDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maartje M L de WinDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frederik G DikkersDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Erik van SpronsenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyse diagnostic accuracy of MRI-DWI in detecting residual disease after cholesteatoma surgery and propose an optimum follow-up (FU) scheme.

methodA retrospective chart review of patients who had cholesteatoma surgery in a tertiary referral centre. 3.0 T non-echo planar diffusion weighted imaging was performed as part of routine FU or indicated on the basis of clinical suspicion of disease. Imaging outcome was verified per-operatively during a second-look procedure or ossicular chain reconstruction. Diagnostic parameters were calculated and stratified by FU length.

resultsFor the FU of 664 cholesteatoma surgeries, 1208 MRI-DWI were obtained and 235 second-look procedures were performed. Most MRI-DWI were obtained within 1.5 yrs of surgery. In this period, significantly less true positive MRI-DWI and significantly more false negative MRI-DWI for residual disease were found compared to other FU periods. Scanning after approximately 3 yrs yielded a significantly higher rate of true positive MRI-DWI, while sensitivity surpassed 80%. Younger patients had a higher risk of developing residual disease. Patients undergoing canal wall up surgery, as well as patients < 12 yrs, were at risk for false negative MRI-DWI. Obliteration reduces the risk of residual disease, while leading to less false negative MRI-DWI.

conclusionA novel radiologic FU scheme for detecting residual disease is suggested for stable ears after cholesteatoma surgery: standard MRI-DWI approximately 3 and 5 yrs after primary surgery, as well as MRI-DWI after approximately 9 yrs for patients with specific risk factors (i.e., patients < 12 yrs or patients undergoing canal wall up surgery without obliteration).

Indexed as

Cholesteatoma, Middle EarDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSecond-Look SurgerySensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultCholesteatoma surgeryFollow upNon-EPI MRI DWIResidual cholesteatomaRoutine second-look surgeries

Identifiers

PMID39269619
PMCPMC11805829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.