ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Feasibility and structural prerequisites for conversion to outpatient treatment in proctology].
Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Potential for Providing Treatment on an Outpatient Rather Than Inpatient Basis: A Nationwide Analysis of Hospital Discharge Data in Germany for the Year 2022.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the introduction of the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) system, costs in the German healthcare system have risen continuously for years. In order to reduce costs the federal government is aiming to shift inpatient services to the outpatient sector. Outpatient services affect many areas of medicine, including proctological operations as these are common and can often be carried out on an outpatient basis.
objectiveThe aim of the present work is to discuss which areas of proctology are suitable for outpatient treatment and which structural requirements are necessary. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe present article is intended to provide a narrative overview with reference to the literature on the topic of outpatient care in proctology. A literature search was carried out using the following keywords: outpatient care, selective sector-level remuneration, day care, proctological operations, AOP catalog and hybrid DRG.
resultsIn proctology, outpatient surgical care is implementable in many cases; however, not every patient is suitable for this. In addition to previous illnesses, patient compliance and the possibility of postoperative care from relatives must also be taken into account. In addition, emergency treatment must be guaranteed. Contraindications include severe heart and circulatory diseases as well as severe coagulation or organ dysfunction. Extensive abscesses, complex fistulas or sphincter reconstructions should be surgically treated in an inpatient setting. The prerequisite for successful outpatient care is to make the sector boundaries between outpatient and inpatient patient care more permeable and to adequately remunerate the interventions.
conclusionIn addition to the surgical indications, the prerequisites for successful proctological operations are the correct assessment of the operational capability and compliance. From an organizational and economic perspective, better networking between outpatient and inpatient treatment and equal remuneration across the sector boundaries are crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39269617What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.