Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269590›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2024

The role of facial distinctiveness in the prioritisation of targets in disjunctive dual-target face search.

Emma Smillie, Natalie Mestry, Dan Clark, Neil Harrison, Nick Donnelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma SmillieUniversity of Bolton, Bolton, BL3 5AB, UK. e.smillie@bolton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7954-6684
Natalie MestryBournemouth University, Bournemouth, BH12 5BB, UK.
Dan ClarkLiverpool Hope University, Liverpool, L16 9JD, UK.
Neil HarrisonLiverpool Hope University, Liverpool, L16 9JD, UK.
Nick DonnellyLiverpool Hope University, Liverpool, L16 9JD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two experiments explored the search for pairs of faces in a disjunctive dual-target face search (DDTFS) task for unfamiliar face targets. The distinctiveness of the target was manipulated such that both faces were typical or distinctive or contained one typical and one distinctive target. Targets were searched for in arrays of eight faces. In Experiment 1, participants completed a DDTFS block with targets learnt over the block of trials. In Experiment 2, the dual-target block was preceded by two training blocks of single-target trials. Participants also completed the upright and inverted long-form Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT+). The results showed that searching for two typical faces leads to one target being prioritised at the expense of the other. The ability to search for non-prioritised typical faces was associated with scores on the CFMT+. This association disappeared when faces were learnt before completing DDTFS. We interpret the findings in terms of the impact of typicality on face learning, individual differences in the ability to learn faces, and the involvement of capacity-limited working memory in the search for unfamiliar faces. The findings have implications for security-related situations where agents must search for multiple unfamiliar faces having been shown their images.

Indexed as

Facial RecognitionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermRecognition, PsychologyYoung AdultDual-target searchFace encodingFace memoryVisual search

Identifiers

PMID39269590
PMCPMC11399498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.