Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269534›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2024

Prognosis evaluation and efficacy analysis of different treatment options for patients with visceral pleural invasion in stage IIA-IIB lung cancer.

Qi Liu, Liusheng Wu, Xiangyu Wang, Yu Feng, Ying Wang, Jun Yan, Xiaoqiang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qi Liu *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518036, China.
Liusheng Wu *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518036, China.
Xiangyu Wang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518036, China.
Yu FengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518036, China.
Ying WangDepartment of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, 300060, China. 121534462@qq.com.
Jun YanSchool of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. yanjun1619@tsinghua.edu.cn.
Xiaoqiang LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518036, China. dr.lixiaoqiang@gmail.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81972829Research and development of intelligent surgical navigation and operating systems for precise liver resection 2022ZLA006Science and Technology Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality JCYJ20180228162607111Scientific Research Project of Education Department of Anhui Province YJS20210324Start-up Fund for Talent Researchers of Tsinghua University 10001020507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveControversy surrounds the treatment of visceral pleural invasion in lung cancer, and no studies have compared the efficacy of its four main treatment options (i.e., surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy). This study aims to compare and analyze surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy outcomes and explore the optimal treatment of visceral pleural invasion in lung cancer.

methodsWe searched electronic databases (i.e., Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database Search) for relevant studies of treatment options for patients with visceral pleural invasion in stage IIA-IIB lung cancer. Searches times were limited to studies published between January 1, 2000 and February 20, 2021. Meta analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software We also downloaded original RNA transcription data about lung cancer invasion in the GEO and TCGA tumor databases, and used R 4.0.3 software to perform differential expression and co-expression gene network analyses.

resultsWe included a total of 25 high-quality (i.e., Jadad score 4-7) studies. Meta-analysis found that surgical treatment was associated with a 3-year survival rate OR = 3.80 (95% CI 3.53, 4.09; P < 0.0001), 5-year survival rate OR = 4.10 (95% CI 3.72, 4.53; P < 0.0001), and median survival time OR = 2.71 (95% CI 2.53, 2.89; P < 0.0001). Chemotherapy was associated with a 3-year survival rate OR = 2.08 (95% CI 1.93, 2.25; P < 0.0001), 5-year survival rate OR = 1.68 (95% CI 1.49, 1.89; P < 0.0001), and median survival time OR = 1.84 (95% CI 1.66, 2.04; P < 0.0001). Targeted therapy was associated with a 3-year survival rate OR = 2.91 (95% CI 2.65, 3.19; P < 0.0001), 5-year survival rate OR = 1.83 (95% CI 1.39, 2.33; P < 0.0001), and median survival time OR = 1.76 (95% CI 1.59, 1.94; P < 0.0001). Finally, immunotherapy was associated with a 3-year survival rate OR = 1.89 (95% CI 1.73, 2.07; P < 0.0001), 5-year survival rate OR = 1.66 (95% CI 1.46, 1.88; P < 0.0001), and median survival time OR = 2.53 (95% CI 2.27, 2.82; P < 0.0001). After screening differential genes and co-expressed genes in tumor gene databases, we found that AC245595.1, ITGB1-DT and AL606489.1 may be involved in the process of lung cancer invasion, and macrophages M1 and M2, CD4+-Th1, CD8+-Th1 may participate in immune infiltration.

conclusionsIn patients with visceral pleural invasion of stage IIA-IIB lung cancer, chemotherapy has shown a significant effect on improving prognosis and enhancing efficacy. However, surgical treatment did not significantly improve the overall prognosis. Therefore, the individual situation of the patient and the comprehensive benefits of the treatment program should be fully considered when developing the treatment program.

Indexed as

Lung cancerPrognosis evaluationTreatment optionsTumor immunityVisceral pleural invasion

Identifiers

PMID39269534
PMCPMC11399369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.