SynthesisAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Comparing the diagnostic efficacy of [
Synthesis in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of MRI protocols for diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- A Review on Biomarker-Enhanced Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction in Ovarian Cancer Management.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis meta-analysis was conducted to assess the relative diagnostic effectiveness of [
methodsA thorough literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to locate relevant studies published up to April 2024. The selected studies were those that evaluated diagnostic performance of [
resultsThe meta-analysis included 23 articles encompassing a total of 1973 patients. The sensitivity of [
conclusionsOur meta-analysis reveals that [
Indexed as
Identifiers
39269504What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.