ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Assessment of Pain and Satisfaction After Orofacial Harmonization Procedures.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reduced Pain Responses With a Digital Automatic Syringe: Behavioral and Molecular Evidence in a Rodent Formalin Model.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis long-term study assessed satisfaction and pain levels following facial aesthetic procedures. The study also aimed to correlate expectations, and psychological and social well-being immediately and after one month, describe perceived age, and assess differences in satisfaction between injectable fillers and other Orofacial Harmonization procedures such as hyaluronic acid treatments (for dark circles, nasolabial fold lips, malar, jaw), botulinum toxin injections, enzymatic lipolysis of the double chin, micro-needling, and PDO threads.
methodsData were collected immediately after the procedures and then again 30 days later. Among the participants, 159 (92.4%) were females and 13 (7.6%) were males, who completed FACE-Q questionnaires addressing perceived age, expectations, psychological and social well-being, satisfaction, and facial appearance, as well as the visual pain scale.
resultsThe average age of the patients treated in the Dental Clinics in Brazil was 40.4 years (SD± 12.7), with 48.8% of participants perceiving themselves as older immediately after the procedures, decreasing to 47.7% after 30 days, and pain intensity was reported as low. The total number of Orofacial Harmonization procedures performed was 256. Satisfaction after 30 days was high, especially among those who received fillers. The psychological and social function scales were positively correlated with satisfaction with the decision, result, and appearance scales. Fillers showed a significant improvement in perceived age appearance, with half of the patients feeling younger after 30 days. The patients exhibited high satisfaction levels in one-month post-aesthetic orofacial harmonization procedures. Despite initially high expectations, patients reported enhanced psychological and social well-being, along with minimal pain during interventions
conclusionPositive correlations were observed between satisfaction, decision-making, result perception, and appearance. Injectable fillers notably improved perceived aging, with a significant portion of patients initially perceiving themselves as older than their actual age, but later feeling younger post-procedure. Fillers also yielded superior satisfaction and pain relief compared to alternative interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39269477What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.