Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269477›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025

Assessment of Pain and Satisfaction After Orofacial Harmonization Procedures.

Andressa Bulegon, Vanessa Sebben, Lilian Rigo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andressa BulegonATITUS Education, Senador Pinheiro, 304/Rodrigues, Passo Fundo, RS, 99070-220, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6813-8220
Vanessa SebbenATITUS Education, Senador Pinheiro, 304/Rodrigues, Passo Fundo, RS, 99070-220, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6285-6205
Lilian RigoATITUS Education, Senador Pinheiro, 304/Rodrigues, Passo Fundo, RS, 99070-220, Brazil. lilian.rigo@atitus.edu.br.ORCID 0000-0003-3725-3047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis long-term study assessed satisfaction and pain levels following facial aesthetic procedures. The study also aimed to correlate expectations, and psychological and social well-being immediately and after one month, describe perceived age, and assess differences in satisfaction between injectable fillers and other Orofacial Harmonization procedures such as hyaluronic acid treatments (for dark circles, nasolabial fold lips, malar, jaw), botulinum toxin injections, enzymatic lipolysis of the double chin, micro-needling, and PDO threads.

methodsData were collected immediately after the procedures and then again 30 days later. Among the participants, 159 (92.4%) were females and 13 (7.6%) were males, who completed FACE-Q questionnaires addressing perceived age, expectations, psychological and social well-being, satisfaction, and facial appearance, as well as the visual pain scale.

resultsThe average age of the patients treated in the Dental Clinics in Brazil was 40.4 years (SD± 12.7), with 48.8% of participants perceiving themselves as older immediately after the procedures, decreasing to 47.7% after 30 days, and pain intensity was reported as low. The total number of Orofacial Harmonization procedures performed was 256. Satisfaction after 30 days was high, especially among those who received fillers. The psychological and social function scales were positively correlated with satisfaction with the decision, result, and appearance scales. Fillers showed a significant improvement in perceived age appearance, with half of the patients feeling younger after 30 days. The patients exhibited high satisfaction levels in one-month post-aesthetic orofacial harmonization procedures. Despite initially high expectations, patients reported enhanced psychological and social well-being, along with minimal pain during interventions

conclusionPositive correlations were observed between satisfaction, decision-making, result perception, and appearance. Injectable fillers notably improved perceived aging, with a significant portion of patients initially perceiving themselves as older than their actual age, but later feeling younger post-procedure. Fillers also yielded superior satisfaction and pain relief compared to alternative interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Indexed as

Cosmetic TechniquesDermal FillersFacial PainPatient SatisfactionSkin AgingAdultBrazilCohort StudiesEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHyaluronic AcidMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementDermal FillersHyaluronic AcidAesthetic dentistryBotulinum toxinDermal fillerHyaluronic acidPatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID39269477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.