Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269470›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2025

Is intensive training with a time interval between instruction and planning CT necessary for deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy in breast cancer?

M Sonnhoff, R-M Hermann, K Aust, A-C Knöchelmann, M Nitsche, B Ernst, H Christiansen, R-M Blach

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Development of a model to guide the decision for radiotherapy in deep-inspiration breath-hold in patients with left-sided breast cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M SonnhoffDepartment of Radiotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. sonnhoff.mathias@mh-hannover.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8123-4962
R-M HermannDepartment of Radiotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
K AustCenter for Radiotherapy and Radiooncology Bremen and Westerstede, 26655, Westerstede, Germany.
A-C KnöchelmannDepartment of Radiotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
M NitscheCenter for Radiotherapy and Radiooncology Bremen and Westerstede, 26655, Westerstede, Germany.
B ErnstCenter for Radiotherapy and Radiooncology Bremen and Westerstede, 26655, Westerstede, Germany.
H ChristiansenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
R-M BlachDepartment of Radiotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreathing instruction and exercises and a time gap between training and planning CT scans (pCT) is recommended as part of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) assisted radiotherapy (RT). However, this is associated with additional time expenditure. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn two of the authors' treatment centers (TC), patient training took place before the planning CT of DIBH-assisted therapy. In TC 1, a further appointment was made with a minimum interval of 2 days to perform the planning CT. At TC 2, the planning CT was performed immediately after the first patient instruction. A retrospective evaluation of the clinical parameters of the therapy was carried out to investigate the relevance of the time gap between DIBH exercises and pCT.

resultsA total of 72 patients were included, 35 of whom were treated in TC 1 and 37 in TC 2. In TC 1, an average interval of ~4 days was observed between patient training and planning CT, while in TC 2, training and CT were performed immediately after each other. No significant differences in radiation dose exposure of the lung on the treated side, the whole lung, or the heart were found between the two centers. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the application of the daily RT fraction. The requirement for daily positioning checks was also the same at both treatment centers.

conclusionThis study does not show any advantages for a time gap between instruction/training and pCT. Skipping the time break does not deteriorate any clinically relevant endpoints.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBreath HoldingBreathing ExercisesPatient Education as TopicRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsBreath guided therapyCardiac toxicityPatient trainingResource management

Identifiers

PMID39269470
PMCPMC11754337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.