Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269371›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2024

Determinants of Successful Implementation of Assistive Technologies for Dementia: Exploratory Survey.

Henriëtte Geralde Van der Roest, Hannah Liane Christie, Manuel Angel Franco-Martin, Rose-Marie Dröes, Marjolein Elizabeth de Vugt, Franka Meiland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Henriëtte Geralde Van der RoestDepartment on Aging, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction (Trimbos Institute), Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9898-923X
Hannah Liane ChristieAlzheimer Center Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2838-2202
Manuel Angel Franco-MartinDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Salamanca University, Zamora, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3639-2523
Rose-Marie DröesDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam location), Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4812-1229
Marjolein Elizabeth de VugtAlzheimer Center Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2113-4134
Franka MeilandDepartment of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam UMC (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam location), Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6219-5390

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite positive results for the use of assistive technologies (ATs) in dementia, the uptake of ATs lags behind. It is considered important to assess determinants of successful or unsuccessful implementation of ATs. Objective: We explored factors that influence the implementation of ATs for community-dwelling people with dementia, with the aim to better understand potentially effective implementation strategies. Methods: A cross-sectional survey for researchers was developed and disseminated, exploring factors that influence either successful or unsuccessful implementation of ATs for dementia. The survey consisted of closed and open questions. Results: The response rate was 10% (21/206); the 21 respondents who completed the survey were from 8 countries. Determinants of implementation were described for 21 ATs, of which 12 were successfully and 9 were unsuccessfully implemented. Various types of ATs were included, such as online platforms, sensors, or physical aids. The main determinants of implementation success were related to the AT itself, contextual factors, research activities, and implementation strategies. There was a lack of research data on some ethical issues and cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: This study provided insight into some main barriers to and facilitators of implementation of ATs in dementia related to the AT itself, context, research-related activities, and applied implementation strategies. Lessons were formulated for various stakeholders to improve the implementation effectiveness of ATs in dementia.

Indexed as

DementiaSelf-Help DevicesAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleSurveys and Questionnairesassistive technologycaregivingdementiaimplementationpsychosocial research

Identifiers

PMID39269371
PMCPMC11440069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.