Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269314›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2024

From diagnosis to survivorship addressing the sexuality of women during cancer.

Rebekah Kaufman, Laila Agrawal, Eleonora Teplinsky, Lauren Kiel, Oyepeju Abioye, Narjust Florez

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07144566 (Implementation of a Nurse-Led Clinical Program to Decrease Sexual Dysfunction Among Gynecological Cancer Patient), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07144566 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Implementation of a Nurse-Led Clinical Program to Decrease Sexual Dysfunction Among Gynecological Cancer Patient

TypeinterventionalSponsorCedars-Sinai Medical CenterRan2025 to 2026Enrolled35ConditionsGynaecologic CancerArmsNurse Led Sexual Health Clinical Program Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring sexual health and function among Malaysian patients with advanced cancer: insights from the EORTC QLQ SH-22 questionnaire.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Breast cancer survivor's sexual health unmet supportive care needs: a mixed-methods study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  7. 2024 SOGC, 2024 NCCN, 2022 ESO-ESMO, and 2018 ASCO: a comparison of female cancer survivorship guidelines for the management of sexual health concerns.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebekah KaufmanDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-8793-4368
Laila AgrawalMedical Oncology, Norton Cancer Institute, Louisville, KY 40241, United States.
Eleonora TeplinskyMedical Oncology, Valley Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center, Paramus, NJ 07652, United States.
Lauren KielDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Oyepeju AbioyeDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Narjust FlorezDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7814-1773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For women diagnosed with cancer, side effects affecting their sexuality are extremely common and can be distressing and life-changing; however, most women are left in the dark without any guidance from their oncology teams regarding possible side effects and treatment options. American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical guidelines provide guidance on the recommended assessments related to the domains of sexual function and their respective interventions. Despite the existence of these guidelines, the reality is that only a few women with cancer are asked about sexual concerns that result from cancer treatments. Common barriers to sexuality discussion reported by oncology providers include a lack of qualification and knowledge, not having a place to refer patients, and not knowing how to start the conversation. Social media remains a widely untapped resource regarding sexuality and cancer interventions, as people are increasingly turning to social media for health information and advice. This may be especially relevant for sexuality, as oncologists may not feel comfortable or well-trained to discuss the topic, and patients may be reluctant to bring up sexual concerns during their visits. Social media can play a critical role in studying sexual health and in sexuality interventions, particularly in adolescent and young adult patients with cancer. Here, we discuss the lack of inclusion regarding sexuality in oncology, the rates of sexual dysfunction in patients with cancer, treatment options for common sexual concerns, how to utilize the reach of various social media channels, and provide patient and provider resources.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSexualityCancer SurvivorsFemaleHumansSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSocial MediaSurvivorshiponcologysexualitysocial media

Identifiers

PMID39269314
PMCPMC11630743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.