ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2025
Lung Cancer Screening Uptake under the Revised United States Preventive Services Task Force Guideline: Assessing Disparities.
Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancement of Patient-Centered Lung Cancer Screening: The MyLungHealth Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA oncology · 2026Trial
- Recruitment preferences for lung cancer screening among 4-IN-THE-LUNG-RUN participants.BMC public health · 2026Trial
- BMI and Initiation of Cancer Screening: A Closer Look at Differences by Race, Ethnicity, and Sex in a Multicenter Population.American journal of preventive medicine · 2026Observational
- Informing the cultural adaptation of a lung cancer screening shared decision-making and navigation intervention for Hispanic adults: a qualitative study.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Barbershop-based lung health navigation for Black men: A feasibility study.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Online Intervention on Lung Cancer Screening Among High-Risk Individuals: Pilot Intervention Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Lung Cancer Screening Access and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis Among American Indian and White Patients.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026Observational
- Lung cancer screening completion rates and neighborhood disadvantage among primary care patients in an integrated delivery network health system: a retrospective data analysis.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Advancing the early detection of lung cancer: Outcomes of a surgeon-led lung nodule clinic in a distressed patient population.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Who is more likely to receive up-to-date lung cancer screening? Identifying key barriers using principal component analysis and SHAP modeling: a weighted cross-sectional analysis of the 2024 BRFSS.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Implementation of a lung cancer screening program at an urban safety-net hospital: enabling solutions via stakeholder engagement.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Addressing Global Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening: Lessons From Puerto Rico and Beyond.JTO clinical and research reports · 2025Article
- Examining Lung Cancer Screening Uptake in the United States: Recent Research and Limitations of Public-Use Data.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Article
- DNA Methylation in Lung Cancer: Predictive Biomarkers for Effective Immunotherapy.International journal of general medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundScanning with low-dose computed tomography reduces lung cancer mortality by 20% among high-risk individuals. Despite its efficacy, the uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS) remains low. Our study aimed to estimate state-level and nationwide LCS rates among eligible individuals and to assess disparities in LCS uptake.
methodsData for this study were obtained from the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to model the associations between predictors and outcome variables and to examine LCS variability across states.
resultsOf the 28,071 participants eligible for LCS, 17.24% underwent LCS. Participants ages 65 to 79 years were [OR, 1.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.54-1.99] more likely to undergo LCS than their younger counterparts. Those who were female (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.94); divorced, separated, or widowed (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98); without health insurance (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22-0.53); without a primary care provider (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.19-0.44); and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or those who did not disclose their chronic obstructive pulmonary disease status (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.31-0.40 and OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.73, respectively) were less likely to undergo LCS than their respective counterparts. LCS uptake also varied significantly across U.S. states.
conclusionsWe observed a low uptake of LCS overall and significant variability in LCS uptake by sociodemographic and health-related factors, as well as by state of residence. IMPACT: The findings from this study have important implications for community health workers and healthcare clinicians and indicate the need to design effective interventions to increase LCS uptake, targeting specific subgroups of populations and particular U.S. states. See related In the Spotlight, p. 9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.