Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269271›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2025

Lung Cancer Screening Uptake under the Revised United States Preventive Services Task Force Guideline: Assessing Disparities.

Abdi T Gudina, Charles S Kamen, Kelly A Hirko, David H Adler, Deborah J Ossip, Edith M Williams, Vinay K Cheruvu, Ana-Paula Cupertino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Lung Cancer Screening Access and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis Among American Indian and White Patients.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Examining Lung Cancer Screening Uptake in the United States: Recent Research and Limitations of Public-Use Data.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abdi T GudinaDepartment of Public Health Sciences at the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-3296-5275
Charles S KamenDivision of Supportive Care in Cancer in the Department of Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-4219-4320
Kelly A HirkoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-0050-655X
David H AdlerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-8797-1621
Deborah J OssipDepartment of Public Health Sciences at the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-2918-597X
Edith M WilliamsDepartment of Public Health Sciences at the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-6392-6148
Vinay K CheruvuDivision of Biostatistics, Environmental Health Sciences, and Epidemiology in the College of Public Health at Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-1563-9419
Ana-Paula CupertinoSurgical Health Outcomes and Reaching for Equity (SHORE), Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-7594-969X

Funding

VISUAL INDICES OF NEUROTOXICITYP30ES001247 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Sally W Thurston · 1985 to 2026
$42.8M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002000 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI THAKAR, JUILEE, VAN WIJNGAARDEN, EDWIN · 2016 to 2024
$4.1M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002000NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES001247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScanning with low-dose computed tomography reduces lung cancer mortality by 20% among high-risk individuals. Despite its efficacy, the uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS) remains low. Our study aimed to estimate state-level and nationwide LCS rates among eligible individuals and to assess disparities in LCS uptake.

methodsData for this study were obtained from the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to model the associations between predictors and outcome variables and to examine LCS variability across states.

resultsOf the 28,071 participants eligible for LCS, 17.24% underwent LCS. Participants ages 65 to 79 years were [OR, 1.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.54-1.99] more likely to undergo LCS than their younger counterparts. Those who were female (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.94); divorced, separated, or widowed (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98); without health insurance (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22-0.53); without a primary care provider (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.19-0.44); and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or those who did not disclose their chronic obstructive pulmonary disease status (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.31-0.40 and OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.73, respectively) were less likely to undergo LCS than their respective counterparts. LCS uptake also varied significantly across U.S. states.

conclusionsWe observed a low uptake of LCS overall and significant variability in LCS uptake by sociodemographic and health-related factors, as well as by state of residence. IMPACT: The findings from this study have important implications for community health workers and healthcare clinicians and indicate the need to design effective interventions to increase LCS uptake, targeting specific subgroups of populations and particular U.S. states. See related In the Spotlight, p. 9.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealthcare DisparitiesLung NeoplasmsAgedBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPreventive Health ServicesTomography, X-Ray ComputedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39269271
PMCPMC11712035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.