ArticleInternational forum of allergy & rhinology2025
Patient-reported disease control versus overall symptom severity as global metrics of chronic rhinosinusitis disease status.
Article in International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient-reported disease control versus overall symptom severity as global metrics of chronic rhinosinusitis disease status.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOverall symptom severity (OSS) and patient-reported chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) control are global measures of CRS identified as consensus, essential criteria for CRS disease control assessment. We sought to determine the functional relationship between these two metrics.
methodsUsing an international multicenter mixed-methods design, 260 CRS patients were recruited. OSS score was measured using a visual analog scale. Patient-reported CRS control was measured as "controlled," "partly controlled," and "uncontrolled." Twelve participants underwent semi-structured interviews to discuss OSS and patient-reported CRS control.
resultsThe majority of interviewed participants felt OSS and patient-reported CRS control measured different constructs-while OSS only measured symptoms, patient-reported CRS control was more global, including not only symptom severity but also concepts such as medication usage, activity impairment, and exacerbations. Nevertheless, OSS score was strongly correlated with (ρ = 0.67, p < 0.001) and highly predictive of patient-reported CRS control. OSS score of >4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-4.2) had 74.7% sensitivity and 93.2% specificity in identifying patients reporting their CRS as not controlled. OSS score of >6.6 (95% CI: 4.1-7.1) had 77.0% sensitivity and 75.9% specificity in identifying patients reporting their CRS as uncontrolled. The 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test score was also predictive of patient-reported CRS disease control but OSS was significantly more predictive.
conclusionsPatients conceptually view patient-reported CRS control as a more global measure that subsumes OSS. Quantitatively, however, OSS is highly correlated with patient-reported CRS control, possibly reflecting their redundancy. For ease of use, we recommend patient-reported CRS control be reflected by OSS <4 for controlled, 4 ≤ OSS < 7 for partly controlled, and OSS ≥7 for uncontrolled CRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.