Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269183›Full record

ReviewPain management2024

MR-conditionality failure modes: a comparison across various spinal cord stimulators.

Kristy A Fisher, Terrance C Jenkins, Vinita Singh, Rupeng Li, Yawar J Qadri

Abstract readReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Review in Pain management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristy A FisherChronic Interventional Pain Medicine department of Anesthesiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2051-264X
Terrance C JenkinsDepartment of Psychiatry, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30310, USA.
Vinita SinghChronic Interventional Pain Medicine department of Anesthesiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8103-1401
Rupeng LiChronic Interventional Pain Medicine department of Anesthesiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2201-6308
Yawar J QadriChronic Interventional Pain Medicine department of Anesthesiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2138-4018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As spinal cord stimulation (SCS) becomes a staple of chronic pain management, the SCS industry must constantly evolve to ensure safety, convenience and enhanced efficacy. Beyond waveforms and size, MR-conditionality is a key differentiator sought out by physicians and patients when choosing SCS devices. Many common SCS complications, including lead migration, can affect the MR-conditionality. The authors reviewed literature published between 2015 and 2024 using PubMed and Google Scholar databases, as well as US FDA labels for magnetic resonance imaging and technical manuals with further confirmation from local representatives. Through extensive review of the literature and direct extraction from each SCS device company, the authors aimed to investigate the specific terms of MR-conditionality under various circumstances. This article provides a collective reference of the MR-conditionality of the currently available SCS devices under normal conditions, as well as with common failure modes, such as lead migration, lead fracture and battery detachment.

Indexed as

Chronic PainEquipment FailureMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpinal Cord StimulationHumansPain Managementbattery IPG detachmentbreakagefracturelead migrationMR-conditionalityspinal cord stimulator (SCS)

Identifiers

PMID39269183
PMCPMC11487941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.