ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2024
Graduate teaching assistants' beliefs and practices regarding mentoring in the context of an online introductory biology CURE: an exploratory study.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Not just an afterthought: the essentiality of professional development for STEM teaching assistants.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2025Article
- Development of the PeeR Investigators Mentoring Experiences in Research (PRIMER) program: a peer mentoring initiative to increase mentoring in CUREs.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2025Article
- Mentoring the mentors: a scalable professional development model for graduate teaching assistants and undergraduate learning assistants in large-enrollment CUREs.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2025Article
- Delivering a collaborative, discipline-specific, and equity, diversity, and inclusion-centered teaching assistant training program in the life sciences.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) have been identified as a promising approach to engage large numbers of students in discovery-based investigations in the biological sciences. As the prevalence of CUREs continues to increase nationwide, the role of graduate teaching assistants (TAs) in facilitating these courses has simultaneously grown. In addition to serving as instructors of CUREs, previous research suggests that educators-including TAs-must also adopt additional roles, including that of a mentor. However, few studies have explicitly examined CURE TAs' beliefs and practices regarding mentorship. To address this need, we conducted an exploratory, concurrent mixed methods study to better understand TAs' self-reported mentoring skills levels and their experiences acting as potential mentors in the context of an online introductory biology SEA-PHAGES CURE. Results indicate that TAs (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.