Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269161›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2024

Individual differences in the perception of phonetic category structure predict speech-in-noise performance.

Emily Myers, Matthew Phillips, Erika Skoe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily MyersDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06268, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9475-764X
Matthew PhillipsDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06268, USA.
Erika SkoeDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06268, USA.

Funding

The Role of Frontal and Temporal Brain Areas in the Perception of Phonetic Category StructureR01DC013064 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI MYERS, EMILY B · 2014 to 2025
$4.3M
The Noisy Life of the Musician: Implications for Healthy Brain AgingR01AG075271 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI Erika E Skoe · 2022 to 2026
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG075271NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech sounds exist in a complex acoustic-phonetic space, and listeners vary in the extent to which they are sensitive to variability within the speech sound category ("gradience") and the degree to which they show stable, consistent responses to phonetic stimuli. Here, we investigate the hypothesis that individual differences in the perception of the sound categories of one's language may aid speech-in-noise performance across the adult lifespan. Declines in speech-in-noise performance are well documented in healthy aging, and are, unsurprisingly, associated with differences in hearing ability. Nonetheless, hearing status and age are incomplete predictors of speech-in-noise performance, and long-standing research suggests that this ability draws on more complex cognitive and perceptual factors. In this study, a group of adults ranging in age from 18 to 67 years performed online assessments designed to measure phonetic category sensitivity, questionnaires querying recent noise exposure history and demographic factors, and crucially, a test of speech-in-noise perception. Results show that individual differences in the perception of two consonant contrasts significantly predict speech-in-noise performance, even after accounting for age and recent noise exposure history. This finding supports the hypothesis that individual differences in sensitivity to phonetic categories mediates speech perception in challenging listening situations.

Indexed as

IndividualityNoisePhoneticsSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptual MaskingSpeech AcousticsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39269161
PMCPMC11401644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.