ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2024
How Do Patients and Their Supports Experience Temperament Based Therapy With Support (TBT-S)? A Qualitative Study.
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes After Temperament Based Therapy With Support (TBT-S): A 12-Month Naturalistic Follow-Up Study.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026Article
- Bridging the gap between neuroscience and clinical practice: a review of the development of Temperament Based Therapy with Support (TBT-S).Journal of eating disorders · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of temperament based therapy with support: a randomized controlled trial study protocol.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTemperament Based Therapy with Support (TBT-S) is an emerging intervention based on empirically supported neurobiological models. Due to its novelty, only a handful of studies to date have examined TBT-S, and none of these previous studies have provided a qualitative evaluation of how TBT-S is perceived by the target population. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to provide an increased understanding of how TBT-S is experienced by patients with an eating disorder and their supports.
methodForty-six patients with an eating disorder and 63 supports consented to be included in the study. The participants provided written responses to six open-ended questions during the post-treatment assessment, detailing their treatment experiences and offering additional feedback. Thematic analysis (TA) was used to analyze their written responses, aiming for a combination of latent and semantic themes.
resultsThe results reveal a substantial overlap between patients' and supports' experiences with TBT-S. In both groups, identified themes suggest increased knowledge and hopefulness as key benefits of the intervention. While both patients and support persons considered TBT-S to be worthwhile, patients also reported finding the intervention quite challenging. Additionally, both groups emphasized the neurobiological rationale as an essential component of TBT-S.
conclusionsThe qualitative evaluations from this study offer new insights into how TBT-S is experienced by the target population. The findings provide an opportunity to incorporate participant suggestions for improving the treatment, and serve as an important building block for future studies aimed at assessing the effectiveness of TBT-S as an augmentation to treatment-as-usual.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.