Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39268888›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2024

Anatomo-functional changes in neural substrates of cognitive memory in developmental amnesia: Insights from automated and manual Magnetic Resonance Imaging examinations.

Loïc J Chareyron, W K Kling Chong, Tina Banks, Neil Burgess, Richard C Saunders, Faraneh Vargha-Khadem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Loïc J ChareyronCognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychiatry Section, Developmental Neurosciences Department, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2043-3711
W K Kling ChongDevelopmental Imaging and Biophysics, Developmental Neurosciences Department, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Tina BanksDevelopmental Imaging and Biophysics, Developmental Neurosciences Department, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Neil BurgessInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.
Richard C SaundersLaboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Faraneh Vargha-KhademCognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychiatry Section, Developmental Neurosciences Department, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

Funding

Neural Mechanisms Of Stimulus Memory And Habit FormationZIAMH000478 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MISHKIN, MORTIMER · 2009 to 2017
$10.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH000478UK Medical Research Council G03000117UK Medical Research Council G1002276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite bilateral hippocampal damage dating to the perinatal or early childhood period and severely impaired episodic memory, patients with developmental amnesia continue to exhibit well-developed semantic memory across the developmental trajectory. Detailed information on the extent and focality of brain damage in these patients is needed to hypothesize about the neural substrate that supports their remarkable capacity for encoding and retrieval of semantic memory. In particular, we need to assess whether the residual hippocampal tissue is involved in this preservation, or whether the surrounding cortical areas reorganize to rescue aspects of these critical cognitive memory processes after early injury. We used voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis, automatic (FreeSurfer) and manual segmentation to characterize structural changes in the brain of an exceptionally large cohort of 23 patients with developmental amnesia in comparison with 32 control subjects. Both the VBM and the FreeSurfer analyses revealed severe structural alterations in the hippocampus and thalamus of patients with developmental amnesia. Milder damage was found in the amygdala, caudate, and parahippocampal gyrus. Manual segmentation demonstrated differences in the degree of atrophy of the hippocampal subregions in patients. The level of atrophy in CA-DG subregions and subicular complex was more than 40%, while the atrophy of the uncus was moderate (-24%). Anatomo-functional correlations were observed between the volumes of residual hippocampal subregions in patients and selective aspects of their cognitive performance, viz, intelligence, working memory, and verbal and visuospatial recall. Our findings suggest that in patients with developmental amnesia, cognitive processing is compromised as a function of the extent of atrophy in hippocampal subregions. More severe hippocampal damage may be more likely to promote structural and/or functional reorganization in areas connected to the hippocampus. In this hypothesis, different levels of hippocampal function may be rescued following this variable reorganization. Our findings document not only the extent, but also the limits of circuit reorganization occurring in the young brain after early bilateral hippocampal damage.

Indexed as

AmnesiaHippocampusMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAtrophyBrainCognitionFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMemoryNeuropsychological TestsYoung Adultdevelopmental amnesiaFreeSurferhippocampusmemoryrecallVBM

Identifiers

PMID39268888
PMCPMC11489024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.