Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39268847›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

Systematic conservation prioritization with the prioritizr R package.

Jeffrey O Hanson, Richard Schuster, Matthew Strimas-Mackey, Nina Morrell, Brandon P M Edwards, Peter Arcese, Joseph R Bennett, Hugh P Possingham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Reconsidering the role of introduced species in the climate-affected and highly invaded eastern Mediterranean.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Guiding stakeholder negotiations in data-poor coastal planning with open-access spatial data.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Informing spatial conservation prioritization with species' traits.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identifying priority areas for conservation to promote connectivity and mitigate the impacts of anthropogenic disturbance.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Modeling nature-based restoration potential across aquatic-terrestrial boundaries.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeffrey O HansonCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4716-6134
Richard SchusterDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3191-7869
Matthew Strimas-MackeyCornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Nina MorrellDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Brandon P M EdwardsDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Peter ArceseDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Joseph R BennettDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Hugh P PossinghamCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plans for expanding protected area systems (prioritizations) need to fulfill conservation objectives. They also need to account for other factors, such as economic feasibility and anthropogenic land-use requirements. Although prioritizations are often generated with decision support tools, most tools have limitations that hinder their use for decision-making. We outlined how the prioritizr R package (https://prioritizr.net) can be used for systematic conservation prioritization. This decision support tool provides a flexible interface to build conservation planning problems. It can leverage a variety of commercial (e.g., Gurobi) and open-source (e.g., CBC and SYMPHONY) exact algorithm solvers to identify optimal solutions in a short period. It is also compatible with a variety of spatially explicit (e.g., ESRI Shapefile, GeoTIFF) and nonspatial tabular (e.g., Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet) data formats. Additionally, it provides functionality for evaluating prioritizations, such as assessing the relative importance of different places selected by a prioritization. To showcase the prioritizr R package, we applied it to a case study based in Washington state (United States) for which we developed a prioritization to improve protected area coverage of native avifauna. We accounted for land acquisition costs, existing protected areas, places that might not be suitable for protected area establishment, and spatial fragmentation. We also conducted a benchmark analysis to examine the performance of different solvers. The prioritization identified 12,400 km

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesDecision Support TechniquesSoftwareWashingtonáreas protegidasbiodiversidadbiodiversityconservation planninginteger programingoptimizaciónoptimizationplaneación de la conservaciónprogramación enteraprotected areas

Identifiers

PMID39268847
PMCPMC11780203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.