Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39268657›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2025

Genome-wide association mapping reveals novel genes and genomic regions controlling root-lesion nematode resistance in chickpea mini core collection.

Ashish Kumar, Yogesh Dashrath Naik, Vedant Gautam, Sunanda Sahu, Vinod Valluri, Sonal Channale, Jayant Bhatt, Stuti Sharma, R S Ramakrishnan, Radheshyam Sharma and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome wide association study unveils the genetic basis of Orobanche crenata resistance in pea.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ashish KumarJawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya (JNKVV), Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7757-2638
Yogesh Dashrath NaikDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University (RPCAU), Pusa, Bihar, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4336-9364
Vedant GautamJawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya (JNKVV), Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0103-1947
Sunanda SahuNational Institute of Plant Health Management (NIPHM), Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Vinod ValluriInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Sonal ChannaleCentre for Crop Health and School of Agriculture and Environmental Science, University of Southern Queensland (UniSQ), Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
Jayant BhattJawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya (JNKVV), Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Stuti SharmaJawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya (JNKVV), Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9138-4684
R S RamakrishnanJawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya (JNKVV), Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Radheshyam SharmaJawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya (JNKVV), Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5019-2624
Himabindu KudapaInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0778-9959
Rebecca S ZwartCentre for Crop Health and School of Agriculture and Environmental Science, University of Southern Queensland (UniSQ), Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5634-7439
Somashekhar M PunnuriCollege of Agriculture, Family Sciences and Technology, Agriculture Research Station, Fort Valley State University, Fort Valley, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4542-4160
Rajeev K VarshneyWA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4562-9131
Mahendar ThudiCentre for Crop Health and School of Agriculture and Environmental Science, University of Southern Queensland (UniSQ), Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2851-6837

Funding

Science Engineering Research Board CRG/2018/003056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root-lesion nematodes (RLN) pose a significant threat to chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by damaging the root system and causing up to 25% economic losses due to reduced yield. Worldwide commercially grown chickpea varieties lack significant genetic resistance to RLN, necessitating the identification of genetic variants contributing to natural resistance. This study identifies genomic loci responsible for resistance to the RLN, Pratylenchus thornei Sher & Allen, in chickpea by utilizing high-quality single nucleotide polymorphisms from whole-genome sequencing data of 202 chickpea accessions. Phenotypic evaluations of the genetically diverse set of chickpea accessions in India and Australia revealed a wide range of responses from resistant to susceptible. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) employing Fixed and Random Model Circulating Probability Unification (FarmCPU) and Bayesian-Information and Linkage-Disequilibrium Iteratively Nested Keyway (BLINK) models identified 44 marker-trait associations distributed across all chromosomes except Ca1. Crucially, genomic regions on Ca2 and Ca5 consistently display significant associations across locations. Of 25 candidate genes identified, five genes were putatively involved in RLN resistance response (glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, heat shock proteins, MYB-like DNA-binding protein, zinc finger FYVE protein and pathogenesis-related thaumatin-like protein). One notably identified gene (Ca_10016) presents four haplotypes, where haplotypes 1-3 confer moderate susceptibility, and haplotype 4 contributes to high susceptibility to RLN. This information provides potential targets for marker development to enhance breeding for RLN resistance in chickpea. Additionally, five potential resistant genotypes (ICC3512, ICC8855, ICC5337, ICC8950, and ICC6537) to P. thornei were identified based on their performance at a specific location. The study's significance lies in its comprehensive approach, integrating multiple-location phenotypic evaluations, advanced GWAS models, and functional genomics to unravel the genetic basis of P. thornei resistance. The identified genomic regions, candidate genes, and haplotypes offer valuable insights for breeding strategies, paving the way for developing chickpea varieties resilient to P. thornei attack.

Indexed as

CicerGenome-Wide Association StudyPlant RootsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsChromosome MappingDisease ResistanceGenes, PlantGenome, PlantLinkage DisequilibriumPlant DiseasesTylenchoidea

Identifiers

PMID39268657
PMCPMC11718594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.