Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39268520›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

The complete protections induced by the oil emulsion vaccines of the novel variant infectious bursal disease viruses against the homologous challenges indicating the important roles of both VP2 and VP1 in the antigenicity and pathogenicity of the virus.

Weiwei Wang, Yu Huang, Yan Zhang, Yuanzheng Qiao, Jun Shi, Jianni Huang, Teng Huang, Tianchao Wei, Meilan Mo, Xiumiao He and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Weiwei Wang *Institute for Poultry Science and Health, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Yu Huang *Institute for Poultry Science and Health, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Yan ZhangInstitute for Poultry Science and Health, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Yuanzheng QiaoInstitute for Poultry Science and Health, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Jun ShiInstitute for Poultry Science and Health, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Jianni HuangInstitute for Poultry Science and Health, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Teng HuangInstitute for Poultry Science and Health, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Tianchao WeiInstitute for Poultry Science and Health, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Meilan MoInstitute for Poultry Science and Health, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Xiumiao HeGuangxi Key Laboratory for Polysaccharide Materials and Modifications, School of Marine Sciences and Biotechnology, Guangxi Minzu University, Nanning, China.
Ping WeiInstitute for Poultry Science and Health, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel variant infectious bursal disease virus (nvIBDV) is an emerging genotype (A2dB1b) that can cause severe and prolonged immunosuppression in young chickens. Despite current commercial vaccines being proven to lack complete protection against nvIBDV, it remains unclear whether the oil emulsion inactivated vaccines (OEVs) of the homologous and heterologous virus or booster immunization can provide effective protection. In this study, OEVs with two types of nvIBDV isolates QZ191002 (A-nv/B-nv) and YL160304 (A-nv/B-HLJ0504-like) were prepared and evaluated the protective effects of OEVs plus the booster immunizations with different current commercial vaccines against the challenge of nvIBDVs. The results from vaccination-challenge experiments showed that nvIBDV could break through the protection provided by only one immunization dose of the commercial vaccines, with the protection rates ranging from 40% to 60%. Interestingly, even with booster immunization with different commercial vaccines, the protection rates could only be increased to 60%-80%. As expected, only the OEVs of the homologous virus could provide 100% protection against the homologous nvIBDV, which could induce high-level specific antibodies, ameliorate target organ damage, and significantly reduce the viral load of the bursal in the challenged chickens. Notably, YL160304-OEV performed better than QZ191002-OEV, providing 100% protection not only against the challenge of homologous strain but also against that of heterologous QZ191002 strain. Antibody levels of the immunized chickens gradually increased after a short decline and reached the highest level on the age of 28 days. Similarly, the percentages of lymphocytes CD4+, CD8+ T, and B in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) were significantly increased on 21 d and 28 d. Notably, despite the nvIBDV, OEVs initially induced a delayed responses in the early stages but ultimately reach higher levels of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. The results of study suggest that even booster immunization with different commercial vaccines cannot provide complete protection against nvIBDV, while the OEVs made by the nvIBDVs can provide full protection. Moreover, YL160304-OEV exhibits a broader protective spectrum against different nvIBDV strains, making it a potential candidate for the development of new vaccine.

Indexed as

antigenicity and pathogenicitybooster immunizationimmune protectionnovel variant infectious bursal disease virus (nvIBDV)oil emulsion inactivated vaccine (OEV)

Identifiers

PMID39268520
PMCPMC11390553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.