Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39268514›Full record

ArticleComputers in human behavior reports2024

Preference for digital media use, biobehavioral attention bias, and anxiety symptoms in adolescents.

Sarah Myruski, Jennifer de Rutte, Abigail Findley, Amy K Roy, Tracy A Dennis-Tiwary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in human behavior reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah MyruskiThe Pennsylvania State University, United States.
Jennifer de RutteHunter College, CUNY, United States.
Abigail FindleyHunter College, CUNY, United States.
Amy K RoyFordham University, United States.
Tracy A Dennis-TiwaryThe Graduate Center, CUNY, United States.

Funding

Neurobehavioral basis of attention bias heterogeneity in adolescent anxietyR56MH111700 · NIMH · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI DENNIS, TRACY A · 2017 to 2018
$1.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH111700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is a critical developmental period of biological and social change during which 1 in 3 youth experience significant anxiety symptoms. The social-emotional lives of the majority of adolescents are largely conducted via digital media use (DMU; e.g., social media, text messaging). Yet the past decade of research on DMU and anxiety has yielded mixed results (e.g., Keles et al., 2020 review), leaving the complex role that DMU might play in the emergence and maintenance of anxiety poorly understood. A key step forward is to leverage psychophysiology to identify individual differences in cognitive and emotional processes that confer vulnerability to potential negative effects of DMU. Further, given the ubiquity of DMU, a greater focus is needed on measurements that move beyond sheer frequency to capture DMU in comparison to face-to-face (FTF) social interactions. This study examined attention bias (AB), characterized by selective and exaggerated attention toward or away from threat, as a moderator of the link between DMU and anxiety in adolescents (

Indexed as

AdolescenceAttention biasCommunication preferenceDigital mediaEvent-related potentials

Identifiers

PMID39268514
PMCPMC11391916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.