Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39268509›Full record

ArticleTobacco induced diseases2024

Geographical location, cigarette risk perceptions, and current smoking among older US adults.

Jenny E Ozga, Cassandra A Stanton, James D Sargent, Alexander W Steinberg, Zhiqun Tang, Laura M Paulin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jenny E OzgaWestat Behavioral Health and Health Policy Practice, Rockville, United States.
Cassandra A StantonWestat Behavioral Health and Health Policy Practice, Rockville, United States.
James D SargentDepartment of Pediatrics, Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, United States.
Alexander W SteinbergDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, United States.
Zhiqun TangWestat Behavioral Health and Health Policy Practice, Rockville, United States.
Laura M PaulinDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, United States.

Funding

Understanding the Influence of Community-level Deprivation and Rural Residence in Cancer CareP20GM148278 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI MARK A CREAGER · 2023 to 2026
$11.6M
Rurality, tobacco use, and COPD: an analysis of two national datasetsR21HL161758 · NHLBI · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI PAULIN, LAURA MARIE · 2021 to 2022
$492k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL161758NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM148278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCigarette smoking and smoking-related lung disease are more common in rural (vs urban) areas of the United States (US). This study examined relationships between geographical location, cigarette risk perceptions, and current smoking among older adults who are at greatest risk of developing smoking-related lung disease.

methodsThe study was a secondary data analysis of 12126 respondents aged ≥40 years from Wave 5 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Weighted descriptive statistics and Poisson regressions assessed current smoking (vs never or former) as a function of geographical location in a stepwise fashion, first unadjusted, then adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, and finally for both sociodemographic characteristics and cigarette risk perceptions (4-item scale), in three separate models. Sensitivity analyses examined whether individual risk perceptions items had a greater impact on the association between geographical location and current smoking.

resultsCurrent smoking was more common among rural (20.6%) than urban (17.6%) residents. The risk ratio (RR) for rural (vs urban) residence on current smoking decreased from 1.17 (95% CI: 1.03-1.32) to 1.14 (95% CI: 1.01-1.29) to 1.08 (95% CI: 0.96-1.21) across the stepwise models. Lower cigarette risk perceptions confounded the rural-current smoking association and was an independent risk factor for smoking (adjusted RR, ARR=2.15; 95% CI: 1.94-2.18). In sensitivity analyses, believing that cigarettes are very or extremely (vs somewhat, slightly, or not at all) harmful to health and agreeing (vs not agreeing) that secondhand smoke causes lung disease in people who do not smoke, confounded the rural-current smoking association whereas beliefs about smoking causing lung cancer or lung disease in people who smoke did not.

conclusionsLower cigarette risk perceptions among rural residents confounded the positive association between rural residence and current smoking. Results from sensitivity analyses highlight potential targets for communication campaigns aimed at promoting more accurate perceptions of the harmful health consequences of cigarette smoking.

Indexed as

communicationcultureharm perceptionruralsocial norms

Identifiers

PMID39268509
PMCPMC11391726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.